Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.101 (2026)
Repealed. 1991, Act 179, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
TELEPHONE COMPANIES AS COMMON CARRIERS
Act 206 of 1913
484.101 Repealed. 1991, Act 179, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.
Repealed. 1991, Act 179, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed sections pertained to the duties, powers, and responsibilities of the PSC in regulating telephone service in competitive markets, basic local exchange service, resale of services, franchise cable companies, and alternative operator service.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1952–2025 · leading case: Rinaldo's Constr. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 559 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 1997).
Rinaldo's Constr. Corp. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 559 N.W.2d 647 (Mich. 1997). “This case arose under the telephone act of 1913, MCL 484.101 et seq.; MSA 22.1441 et seq., which was repealed in 1991.”
Ram Broad. of Michigan, Inc v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 317 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “Since 1965, RCCs in Michigan have been regulated by the MPSC, by asserting jurisdiction under 1913 PA 206 , commonly called the telephone company act, MCL 484.101 et seq.; MSA 22.1441 et seq. Regulation has proceeded on a case-by-case basis with the MPSC granting, denying and…”
Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. Gen. Tel. Co., 65 N.W.2d 748 (Mich. 1954). “)) and telephone companies as common carriers (CL 1948, §484.101 et seq. [Stat Ann §22.1441 et seq.”
In Re Procedure & Format for Filing Tariffs Under the Michigan Telecomm. Act, 534 N.W.2d 194 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “It replaced the telephone act, 1913 PA 206 , MCL 484.101 et seq.; MSA 22.1441 et seq. MCL 484.”
Michigan Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 50 N.W.2d 826 (Mich. 1952). “* See PA 1913, No 206, as amended (OL 1948, § 484.101 et seq. [Stat Ann § 22.1441 et seq.”
Sullivan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 287 N.W.2d 188 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “; § 14 of the act regulating telephone companies as common carriers, MCL 484.101 et seq.; MSA 22.1441 et seq., and § 20 of the act regulating water companies, MCL 486.”
In Re Pub. Serv. Comm'n's Determination Regarding Coin-Operated Telephones, Direct-Inward Dialing & Touchtone Serv., No 1, 514 N.W.2d 535 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “Previously, the commission had not regulated privately owned pay telephones, because under the *346 telephone act of 1913, MCL 484.101 et seq.; MSA 22.1441 et seq., it lacked jurisdiction, as it recognized in its opinion in the case at bar, to regulate resales of…”
Dobronski v. Tobias & Assocs., Inc. (E.D. Mich. 2025). “, the Michigan Telephone Companies as Common Carriers Act (“MTCCCA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.101 et seq., the Michigan Home Solicitation Sales Act (“MHSSA”), Mich.”
City of Ludington v. Michigan Associated Tel. Co., 52 N.W.2d 605 (Mich. 1952). “PA 1913, No 206 (CL 1948, § 484.101 et seq. [Stat Ann § 22.1441 et seq.”
Denny's Auto & Towing, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 343 N.W.2d 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “The specific grant of power to regulate originated in the telephone company act, MCL 484.101; MSA 22.1441. This act gave the Michigan Railroad Commission the same jurisdiction and powers over all "telephones, telephone lines and telephone companies within the state” as it had…”
Mark W Dobronski v. Transamerica Life Ins. (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “Section 25 used to be part of a robust, comprehensive act regulating the telephone industry in this state.”
Mark W Dobronski v. Transamerica Life Ins. (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “Section 25 used to be part of a robust, comprehensive act regulating the telephone industry in this state.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.