Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 500 / Act 218 of 1956

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.100

Insurance code of 1956; short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.100 Insurance code of 1956; short title.

Sec. 100.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as "the insurance code of 1956".

History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of the Department of Insurance and Office of the Commissioner on Insurance from the Department of Licensing and Regulation to the Department of Commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1991-9, compiled at MCL 338.3501 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

    For transfer of authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the insurance bureau and the commissioner of insurance to the commissioner of the office of financial and insurance services and the office of financial and insurance services, see E.R.O. No. 2000-2, compiled at MCL 445.2003 of the Michigan compiled laws.

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

PopularName Notes:

Essential Insurance
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 76 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1961–2026 · leading case: Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Advisory Opinion Re Constitutionality of 1972 PA 294 (1973) mich · cites it 4× “The title to that which is known as "The Insurance Code of 1956" (MCLA 500.100 et seq.; MSA 24.1100 et seq.”
Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Commissioner of the Office of Financial & Insurance Services (2006) mich · cites it 2× “2029, claiming that the PPO endorsement violated the Insurance Code, MCL 500.100 et seq. Petitioners asked the Commissioner to withdraw approval of the endorsement pursuant to MCL 500.”
Churella v. Pioneer State Mutual Insurance (2003) michctapp · cites it 2× “§ 500.100 et seq., did not incorporate by reference the appraisal rights given to shareholders by the general corporation act, M.”
Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault v. Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass'n (2016) michctapp · cites it 2× “In addition, as part of the Insurance Code, MCL 500.100 et seq., MCL 500.134 “specifically describes and exempts the MCCA’s records from FOIA disclosure[.”
Denham v. Bedford (1980) mich · cites it 2× “According to this argument, the Legislature did not intend that the prejudgment interest statute would apply to insurance companies; because if it had, it would have included the statute within either the Insurance Code of 1956, *527 MCL 500.100 et seq.; MSA 24.1100 et seq., or…”
In Re Certified Question (1982) mich “MCL 500.100 et seq.; MSA 24.1100 et seq. [10] The extensive regulation of the insurance industry provided for in that code indicates a legislative purpose to protect policyholders.”
Michigan Basic Property Insurance v. Office of Financial & Insurance Regulation (2010) michctapp “” Title of 1956 PA 218 , the Insurance Code, MCL 500.100 et seq. As noted earlier, petitioner “was *563 created to provide property insurance to qualified persons who cannot get insurance in the regular market.”
Ins. Institute v. Com'r, Financial & Ins. (2010) mich · cites it 2× “[26] See MCL 500.100, which states that the Insurance Code is "[a]n act to .”
Michigan Podiatric Medical Ass'n v. National Foot Care Program, Inc. (1989) michctapp “, and the Insurance Code, MCL 500.100 et seq.; MSA 24.1100 et seq. The ppa applies to an organization described as "an insurer, a dental care corporation, hospital service corporation, medical care corporation, health care corporation, or third party administrator.”
Barker v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (1983) mied “§ 500.100 et seq. Section 230 of the Insurance Code of 1956 provides: Every penalty provided for by this code, if not otherwise provided for, shall be sued for and recovered in the name of the people by the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the insurer or the agent or…”
Hobbins v. Attorney General (1994) michctapp · cites it 2× “, and the Insurance Code, MCL 500.100 et seq. ; MSA 24.1100 et seq.”
Cason v. Auto Owners Insurance (1989) michctapp “Auto Owners asserted in its response to Cason’s motion for summary disposition and in its motion for reconsideration that the terms "owner” and "registrant” for purposes of the no-fault act should have the same meaning.”
Show all 76 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.