Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2005a (2026)

Unfair method of competition; unfair or deceptive act or practice.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.2005a Unfair method of competition; unfair or deceptive act or practice.

Sec. 2005a.

    An unfair method of competition and an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance includes all of the following:

    (a) Knowingly making any misleading representation or incomplete or fraudulent comparison of any insurance policies, certificates, or contracts of insurers, health care corporations, or health maintenance organizations for the purpose of inducing, or tending to induce, any person to lapse, forfeit, surrender, terminate, retain, pledge, assign, borrow on, or convert any insurance policy, certificate, or contract or to take out a policy, certificate, or contract with another insurer, health care corporation, or health maintenance organization.

    (b) Employing any method of marketing having the effect of or tending to induce the purchase of insurance through force, fright, or threat, whether explicit or implied, or undue pressure.

    (c) Making use directly or indirectly of any method of marketing that fails to disclose in a conspicuous manner that a purpose of the method of marketing is solicitation of insurance and that contact will be made by an insurance agent or insurance company.

History: Add. 1992, Act 84, Imd. Eff. June 2, 1992

PopularName Notes:

Act 218
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1995–1995 · leading case: Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 890 F. Supp. 671 (E.D. Mich. 1995).
Robertson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 890 F. Supp. 671 (E.D. Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “Mich.Comp.Laws § 500.2005a. The instant complaint’s averments coincide with the above-described activities made unlawful by the Unfair Trade Practices Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.