Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2050 (2026)

Construction of chapter.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956

Act 218 of 1956

500.2050 Construction of chapter.

Sec. 2050.

The enumeration in this uniform trade practices act of powers vested in the commissioner or of specific unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts and practices in the business of insurance is not exclusive or restrictive or intended to limit the powers of the commissioner or any court of review but the provisions of such act are in all respects cumulative of and supplemental to the insurance code and all other applicable Michigan statutes or common law.

History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1985–2013 · leading case: Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Comm'r of the Off. of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 685 N.W.2d 428 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Michigan Chiropractic Council v. Comm'r of the Off. of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 685 N.W.2d 428 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “2001 to MCL 500.2050], and that a hearing by the commissioner in respect thereto would be in the interest of the public, he shall first give notice in writing.”

Health Care Ass'n Workers Comp. Fund v. Dir. of the Bureau of Worker's Comp., 694 N.W.2d 761 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005). “2001 to MCL 500.2050].” (Emphasis added.) On the basis of its assertion that it is not engaged in the business of insurance, plaintiff argues that neither the Insurance Commissioner nor defendant has authority to enforce the provisions of MCL 500.”

Negrete v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of North Am., 927 F. Supp. 2d 870 (C.D. Cal. 2013). “§ 40-2408 (b) (same); Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2050 (providing that the provisions of the trade practices act are “in all respects cumulative of and supplemental to the insurance code and all other applicable Michigan statutes or common law”); Miss.”

Kekel v. Allstate Ins., 375 N.W.2d 455 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “” MCL 500.2050; MSA 24.12050. The key to analysis of plaintiffs’ argument lies in the language of § 2050 and specifically whether or not the Michigan Consumer Protection Act is an applicable Michigan statute.”

Allstate Ins. v. Dep't of Ins., 491 N.W.2d 616 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “MCL 500.2050; MSA 24.12050. The commissioner argues that this section alleviates the tension between the two chapters.”

McC v. Comm'r of Off. of Fin. & Ins. Serv., 685 N.W.2d 428 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “2001 to MCL 500.2050], and that a hearing by the commissioner in respect thereto would be in the interest of the public, he shall first give notice in writing .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.