Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 500 / Act 218 of 1956
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2832 (2026)

Repealed. 1990, Act 305, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.2832 Repealed. 1990, Act 305, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.

    Repealed. 1990, Act 305, Eff. Jan. 1, 1992.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to form of standard policy.

PopularName Notes:

Act 218
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 94 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1961–2025 · leading case: Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 702 N.W.2d 539 (Mich. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n, 702 N.W.2d 539 (Mich. 2005). · cites it 8× “), [13] this Court extended the Peloso/Tom Thomas tolling doctrine to Michigan's statutory standard form fire insurance policy, former MCL 500.2832, which then provided that [n]o suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law…”
Borman v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co, 521 N.W.2d 266 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 10× “) See MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832. Plaintiff Borman argues on appeal that use of the term "any insured” in defendant’s policy violates the legislative intent underlying the standardized stat *494 utory policy.”
Borman v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 499 N.W.2d 419 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 8× “The specific question in the instant appeal is whether the language in defendant’s insurance policy prevents recovery by an innocent coinsured, notwithstanding the language of the standard fire policy outlined by the Legislature in MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832, 1 which provided in…”
Heniser v. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins., 534 N.W.2d 502 (Mich. 1995). · cites it 4× “The only exclusion involving occupancy provides that an insurance company will not be liable for losses occurring when "a described building, whether intended for occupancy by owner or tenant, is vacant or unoccupied beyond a period of sixty consecutive days.”
In Re Certified Question, 319 N.W.2d 320 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 5× “"Should the statutory standard form fire insurance policy [MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832] which includes the following language at line 157: "`No suit or action on this policy for the recovery of any claim shall be sustainable in any court of law or equity unless all the…”
Griswold Props., LLC v. Lexington Ins., 740 N.W.2d 659 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 7× “The amount of loss for which this Company may be hable shall be payable within sixty days after proof of loss, as herein provided, is received by this Company and ascertainment of the loss is made either by agreement between the insured and this Company expressed in writing or…”
Davis v. Nat'l Am. Ins. Co., 259 N.W.2d 433 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 6× “The fire insurance policy issued by defendant contained the following provisions mandated by MCLA 500.2832; MSA 24.12832: "Appraisal. In case the insured and this Company shall fail to agree as to the actual cash value or the amount of loss, then, on the written demand of…”
Tebo v. Havlik, 343 N.W.2d 181 (Mich. 1984). · cites it 2× “The source of funding of PIP benefits, and a tort recovery which it replaces — a pool of money funded by premiums paid by owners and operators of automobiles — remains essentially unchanged after the enactment of the no-fault act.”
Cmty. Nat'l Bank v. Michigan Basic Prop. Ins., 407 N.W.2d 31 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 5× “Mbpia responded to the complaint with a motion for accelerated judgment based on the one-year period of limitation contained in the policy and in MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832. At a hearing held February 19, 1983, mbpia argued that the bank’s cause of action arose in January of…”
Kassab v. Michigan Basic Prop. Ins., 460 N.W.2d 300 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “[MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832, lines 157-161.”
Tom Thomas Org., Inc. v. Reliance Ins., 242 N.W.2d 396 (Mich. 1976). · cites it 2× “(The terms of the standard fire insurance policy in Michigan are likewise prescribed by statute, MCLA 500.2832; MSA 24.12832.) Whether construing statutes or contracts, courts look to the language used and the context for the purpose sought to be achieved.”
Morgan v. Cincinnati Ins., 307 N.W.2d 53 (Mich. 1981). · cites it 2× “” MCL 500.2832; MSA 24.12832. The insurer in this case would have us read this provision as if it stated "[t]his entire policy shall be void if * * * any person insured” has committed fraud.”
Show all 94 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2832(1) — 3 cases
Davis v. Nat'l Am. Ins. Co., 259 N.W.2d 433 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “The fire insurance policy issued by defendant contained the following provisions mandated by MCLA 500.2832; MSA 24.12832: "Appraisal. In case the insured and this Company shall fail to agree as to the actual cash value or the amount of loss, then, on the written demand of…”
Wilson v. Home Owners Mut. Ins., 384 N.W.2d 807 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986).
Union Lake Assocs., Inc. v. Com. & Indus. Ins., 280 N.W.2d 469 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.