Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3365 (2026)

Eligibility for automobile insurance; requesting assignment, rejecting assignment, or requesting reassignment; notice of statutory eligibility standards.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.3365 Eligibility for automobile insurance; requesting assignment, rejecting assignment, or requesting reassignment; notice of statutory eligibility standards.

Sec. 3365.

    (1)  Any qualified applicant shall be eligible for automobile insurance as provided by this chapter through the facility.

    (2) Any qualified applicant shall have the right to request assignment, reject assignment, or request reassignment to any designated participating member in accordance with procedures established by the board of governors. The procedures may limit the assignments to conform to the contractual arrangement of the recipient of assignments or servicing carrier with the facility. The opportunity to request assignment and reject assignment shall be provided on the application. The opportunity to request reassignment shall be stated on the policy at the time of issuance and shall be offered in writing to the insured at the time of renewal.

    (3) At least once each year, each designated participating member shall notify all persons insured through the member on behalf of the facility, in a form approved by the commissioner, of the statutory eligibility standards for obtaining automobile insurance from insurers in the voluntary market.

History: Add. 1969, Act 346, Eff. Apr. 1, 1970 ;-- Am. 1979, Act 145, Eff. Jan. 1, 1981

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

PopularName Notes:

Essential Insurance
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1978–1978 · leading case: Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978).
Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978). · cites it 2× “In addition, a motorist insured by the "Automobile Placement Facility" is exposed to the procedural and substantive inadequacies of the facility's rate regulatory scheme (which are, essentially, the same as the inadequacies of the rate regulatory scheme for motorists able to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.