Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.5801 (2026)
Formation of domestic mutual insurer; nonprofit status; powers of nonprofit mutual disability insurer; limitation.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956
Act 218 of 1956
500.5801 Formation of domestic mutual insurer; nonprofit status; powers of nonprofit mutual disability insurer; limitation.
Sec. 5801.
(1) A domestic mutual insurer may be formed with nonprofit status.
(2) A nonprofit mutual disability insurer has all powers of a mutual insurer organized under this chapter unless expressly reserved. A nonprofit mutual disability insurer that has merged with a nonprofit health care corporation as provided in section 5805(1) shall not convert its status to a stock insurer under chapter 59 or reorganize under chapter 60.
History: Add. 2013, Act 5, Imd. Eff. Mar. 18, 2013
PopularName Notes:
Act 218Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2014–2014 · leading case: Waisanen v. Superior Twp., 854 N.W.2d 213 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014).
Waisanen v. Superior Twp., 854 N.W.2d 213 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “MCL 500.5801(4). “[W]hat acts or uses are sufficient to constitute adverse possession depends upon the facts in each case and to a large extent upon the character of the premises.”
Gary Morris v. Est. of Ruby Morris (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “MCL 500.5801(4). “[W]hat acts or uses are sufficient to constitute adverse possession depends upon the facts in each case and to a large extent upon the character of the premises.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.5801(4) — 2 cases
Waisanen v. Superior Twp., 854 N.W.2d 213 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “MCL 500.5801(4). “[W]hat acts or uses are sufficient to constitute adverse possession depends upon the facts in each case and to a large extent upon the character of the premises.”
Gary Morris v. Est. of Ruby Morris (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “MCL 500.5801(4). “[W]hat acts or uses are sufficient to constitute adverse possession depends upon the facts in each case and to a large extent upon the character of the premises.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.