Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 51.362 (2026)

Civil service employees; tenure; removal, discharge, reduction or suspension, procedures.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION


Act 298 of 1966


51.362 Civil service employees; tenure; removal, discharge, reduction or suspension, procedures.

Sec. 12.

    The tenure of everyone holding an office, place, position or employment under the provisions of this act shall be only during good behavior and efficient service; and any such person may be removed or discharged, suspended without pay, or deprived of vacation privileges or other special privileges by the appointing officer for incompetency, inefficiency, dishonesty, drunkenness, immoral conduct, insubordination, discourteous treatment to the public, neglect of duty, violation of the provisions of this act or the rules of the commission, or any other failure of good behavior, or any acts of misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance in office. No member of any department within the terms of this act shall be removed, discharged, reduced in rank or pay or suspended, or otherwise punished, except for cause, and in no event until he shall have been furnished with a written statement of the charges and the reasons for such actions. All charges shall be void unless filed within 90 days of the date of the violation. In every case of charges having been made, a copy of the statement of reasons therefor and the answer thereto, if the person sought to be removed desires to file such written answer, shall be furnished to the civil service commission and entered upon its records. The answer shall be filed by the member within 5 days after service of the charges upon him. If the person sought to be removed or reduced shall demand it, the civil service commission shall grant him a public hearing, which hearing shall be held within a period of 10 days from the filing of the charges in writing and a written answer thereto. Pending the period between the making of the charges as a basis for removal and the decision thereon by the commission, the member shall remain in office, but shall be suspended from duty without pay. At the hearing the burden shall be upon the person sought to be removed to prove that the removal is not justified. If the civil service commission shall determine that the action of the removing officer was not justified, then the person sought to be removed shall be reinstated with full pay for the entire period during which he may have been prevented from performing his usual employment, and no charges shall be officially recorded against his record. A written record of all testimony taken at such hearings shall be kept and preserved by the civil service commission, which record shall be sealed and not be available for public inspection, if no appeal is taken from the action of the commission. If the civil service commission sustains the action of the removing officer the person removed shall have an immediate right of appeal on certiorari to the circuit court of the county. The appeal shall be taken within 90 days from the entry by the civil service commission of its final order. Upon such an appeal being taken and docketed with the clerk of the circuit court, the circuit court shall proceed to hear the appeal upon the original record taken therein and no additional proof shall be permitted to be introduced. The circuit court's decision shall be final, saving to the employee, however, the right to petition the supreme court for a review of the court's decision. The removing officer and the person sought to be removed at all times, both before the civil service commission and upon appeal, may employ counsel to represent either of them before the civil service commission and upon appeal.

    If for any reason of economy it shall be deemed necessary by any county to reduce the number of paid members of any department, then the county shall follow the following procedure:

    The removals shall be accomplished by suspending in numerical order, commencing with the last man appointed to the department, all recent appointees to the department until such reductions shall have been accomplished. If the department again is increased in number to the strength existing prior to the reduction of members, the members suspended last under the terms of this act shall be first reinstated before any new appointments to the department shall be made.

History: 1966, Act 298, Imd. Eff. July 14, 1966

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1971–1990 · leading case: Locke v. MacOmb Cnty., 187 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
Locke v. MacOmb Cnty., 187 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 6× “” *25 MCLA §51.362 (Stat Ann 1970 Cum Supp § 5.”
Falk v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Macomb Cty., 225 N.W.2d 713 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff's third objection concerns the sufficiency of the "basis" upon which the Commission sustained the sheriff, and upon which the circuit court in turn affirmed the order of the Commission. Plaintiff contends that evidence of misconduct occurring more than 90 days before…”
Werner v. MacOmb Cnty. Civil Serv. Comm'n, 258 N.W.2d 549 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 5× “See MCLA 51.362; MSA 5.1191(112). The Civil Service Commission heard evidence of the dismissal motion on January 8, 16, and February 20, 1975.”
Core v. City of Traverse City, 280 N.W.2d 569 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “Had the Legislature intended to disallow all pay pending the commission’s decision they could have inserted language comparable to that contained in MCL 51.362; MSA 5.1191(112): *503 "Pending the period between the making of the charges as a basis for removal and the decison…”
Locke v. MacOmb Cnty., 199 N.W.2d 166 (Mich. 1972). “The plaintiff’s rights and duties under MCLA 51.362; MSA 5.1191(112) in this circumstance are not expressly stated.”
Adams v. City of Detroit, 458 N.W.2d 903 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “MCL 51.362; MSA 5.1191(112). According to plaintiff, it is clear legal error to attempt to stretch the vpa to encompass the grounds set forth for discharge in the civil service act.”
O'Connor v. Oakland Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 426 N.W.2d 816 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 51.362; MSA 5.1191(112) does provide for appeals from decisions of a civil service commission in sheriffs’ departments to circuit court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.