Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 550 / Act 64 of 1984
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 550.251 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE COORDINATION OF BENEFITS ACT


Act 64 of 1984


550.251 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as "the coordination of benefits act".

History: 1984, Act 64, Imd. Eff. Apr. 18, 1984

Compiler's Notes:

    For transfer of the Department of Insurance and Office of the Commissioner on Insurance from the Department of Licensing and Regulation to the Department of Commerce, see E.R.O. No. 1991-9, compiled at MCL 338.3501 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

    For transfer of authority, powers, duties, functions, and responsibilities of the insurance bureau and the commissioner of insurance to the commissioner of the office of financial and insurance services and the office of financial and insurance services, see E.R.O. No. 2000-2, compiled at MCL 445.2003 of the Michigan compiled laws.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–1994 · leading case: Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc, 514 N.W.2d 150 (Mich. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Physicians Health Plan, Inc, 514 N.W.2d 150 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 6× “If the Legislature had desired to mandate the availability of uncoordinated insurance from group health insurance plans, such a prohibition would be reasonably found in the Coordination of Benefits Act, MCL 550.251 et seq.; MSA 24.13671 et seq.”
Auto Club Ins. Ass'n v. Frederick & Herrud, Inc., 377 N.W.2d 902 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “” 3 We note parenthetically that 1984 PA 64 , MCL 550.251 et seq.; MSA 24.13671 et seq.”
Reinforcing Iron Workers Local 426 Health & Welfare Fund v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 746 F. Supp. 668 (E.D. Mich. 1990). “§ 550.251 et seq., in February of 1990, seeking a determination of liability.”
Albright v. Butterworth Hmo, 492 N.W.2d 457 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). “Plaintiffs have raised only one issue on appeal for our resolution: whether the trial court erred in granting summary disposition for defendant because the coordination-of-benefits provision in defendant’s health maintenance organization (hmo) *285 contract is invalid under the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.