Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.2101

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT


Act 255 of 2015


552.2101 Short title.

Sec. 101.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "uniform interstate family support act".

History: 2015, Act 255, Eff. Jan. 1, 2016

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2017–2025 · leading case: 20250219_C369216_30_369216.Opn.Pdf
20250219_C369216_30_369216.Opn.Pdf (2025) michctapp · cites it 2× “In August 2021, plaintiff sought child support from defendant under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), MCL 552.2101 et seq., by filing an Application for Establishment of a Decision with the central authority in Brazil, as defined by the UIFSA, MCL 552.”
Sonja Faith Moffett v. David Jemmott Jr (2017) michctapp “2201(b), which states, “The individual submits to the jurisdiction of this state by consent in a record, by entering a general appearance, or by filing a responsive document having the effect of waiving any contest to personal jurisdiction.”
Sonja Faith Moffett v. David Jemmott Jr (2017) michctapp “2201(b), which states, “The individual submits to the jurisdiction of this state by consent in a record, by entering a general appearance, or by filing a responsive document having the effect of waiving any contest to personal jurisdiction.”
Charles Raymond v. Donna Raymond (2023) michctapp “2603 provides: (1) A support order or income-withholding order issued in another state or a foreign support order is registered when the order is filed in the registering tribunal of this state. (2) A registered support order issued in another state or a foreign country is…”
Lac v. Gls (2024) michctapp “, or to register a foreign judgment or order under MCL 552.2101 et seq. or MCL 722.1101 et seq.”
Cruz v. Robert Bosch, LLC (2024) ilnd “; Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.2101 et seq. Bosch LLC argues that under either Michigan’s or Illinois’ version of the law, it is not an appropriate defendant in this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.