Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.613 (2026)

Failure to comply with order; contempt; finding; initiation of proceedings; jurisdiction.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

SUPPORT AND PARENTING TIME ENFORCEMENT ACT

Act 295 of 1982

552.613 Failure to comply with order; contempt; finding; initiation of proceedings; jurisdiction.

Sec. 13.

The court may find a source of income in contempt, require the source of income to pay an amount according to section 11a(2) if the terms of that section have been satisfied, and fine the source of income if the source of income is served with a notice of income withholding and fails to comply with the notice or to pay withheld amounts to the friend of the court after the order becomes binding under section 11. The IV-D agency is responsible for initiating contempt proceedings under this section. Contempt proceedings under this section may be initiated in any county with jurisdiction over the source of income.

History: 1982, Act 295, Eff. July 1, 1983 ;-- Am. 1998, Act 334, Imd. Eff. Aug. 10, 1998 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 206, Eff. Feb. 28, 2005

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: In Re Contempt of United Stationers Supply Co, 608 N.W.2d 105 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re Contempt of United Stationers Supply Co, 608 N.W.2d 105 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “MCL 552.613; MSA 25.164(13) provides: The court may find a source of income in contempt and fine the source of income if the source of income is served with a notice of income withholding and fails to comply with the notice or to pay withheld amounts to the friend of the court…”

Cruz v. Robert Bosch, LLC (N.D. Ill. 2024). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 552.613 . A 4Because the Court does not have personal jurisdiction over Bosch Steering and Cruz has failed to state a claim against Bosch LLC, the Court will not decide the question of pen- alties, and whether Illinois or Michigan law applies, at this stage…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.