Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 565.451 (2026)

Repealed. 1965, Act 178, Imd. Eff. July 15, 1965.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

RECORDING AFFIDAVITS AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY

Act 123 of 1915

565.451 Repealed. 1965, Act 178, Imd. Eff. July 15, 1965.

Repealed. 1965, Act 178, Imd. Eff. July 15, 1965.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to affidavits as to parties to instruments, recording, and perjury.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: United States v. Currency $1,756.03 in U.S. Currency from Huntington Nat'l Bank Account No. xxxxxxx0024 (E.D. Mich. 2025).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Est. of Matt Malnar v. Ivan Malnar (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The probate court relied on MCL 565.451(d)(2)(b) to hold that because Matt died before Hansley signed the Scrivener’s Affidavit, the affidavit was invalid.”

United States v. Currency $1,756.03 in U.S. Currency from Huntington Nat'l Bank Account No. xxxxxxx0024 (E.D. Mich. 2025). · cites it 2× “LAWS § 565.451(b). In accordance with this state statute, the Government recorded an affidavit of interest in the Register of Deeds Office in Jackson County, Michigan, on July 26, 2019—the day after the FBI seized all Defendants in rem.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 565.451(b) — 1 case

United States v. Currency $1,756.03 in U.S. Currency from Huntington Nat'l Bank Account No. xxxxxxx0024 (E.D. Mich. 2025). “LAWS § 565.451(b). In accordance with this state statute, the Government recorded an affidavit of interest in the Register of Deeds Office in Jackson County, Michigan, on July 26, 2019—the day after the FBI seized all Defendants in rem.”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 565.451(d)(2)(b) — 1 case

Est. of Matt Malnar v. Ivan Malnar (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “The probate court relied on MCL 565.451(d)(2)(b) to hold that because Matt died before Hansley signed the Scrivener’s Affidavit, the affidavit was invalid.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.