Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 566.101 (2026)

Conveyance with intent to defraud; invalidity.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Revised Statutes of 1846

R.S. of 1846

566.101 Conveyance with intent to defraud; invalidity.

Sec. 1.

Every conveyance of any estate or interest in lands, or the rents and profits of lands, and every charge upon lands or upon the rents and profits thereof, made or created with intent to defraud prior or subsequent purchasers for a valuable consideration, of the same lands, rents or profits, as against such purchasers, shall be void.

History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 80 ;-- CL 1857, 3172 ;-- CL 1871, 4687 ;-- How. 6174 ;-- CL 1897, 9504 ;-- CL 1915, 11970 ;-- CL 1929, 13406 ;-- CL 1948, 566.101

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1949–2015 · leading case: Shue & Voeks, Inc v. Amenity Design & Mfg., Inc, 511 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Shue & Voeks, Inc v. Amenity Design & Mfg., Inc, 511 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “891, MCL 566.101; MSA 26.901, and MCL 566.221; MSA 26.”

Bodenhamer Bldg. Corp. v. Architectural Rsch. Corp. Am. Standards Testing Bureau, Inc. & Ar-Lite Panelcraft, Inc., 873 F.2d 109 (6th Cir. 1989). “The question of fraudulent intent, in all cases arising under Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 566.101 et seq. is a question of fact and not of law.”

Citizens Bank v. Randie K Black (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “Because of the inaccurate recitation in the sheriff’s deed, Black claims a violation of MCL 566.101, which provides: Every conveyance of any estate or interest in lands, or the rents and profits of lands, and every charge upon lands or upon the rents and profits thereof, made or…”

Baker v. Glander, 188 N.W.2d 263 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971). · cites it 2× “The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for accelerated judgment on the basis that no verbal agreement was completed, and the deed did not comply with the statute of frauds, MCLA § 566.101 et seq. (Stat Ann 1970 Rev § 26.”

Markham v. Devette, 36 N.W.2d 203 (Mich. 1949). “Laws 1948, § 566.101 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 26.901 et seq.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.