Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 567.225 (2026)

Outstanding travelers checks, money orders, or similar written instruments.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ACT


Act 29 of 1995


567.225 Outstanding travelers checks, money orders, or similar written instruments.

Sec. 5.

    (1) Subject to subsection (4), any sum payable on a travelers check that is outstanding for more than 15 years after its issuance is presumed abandoned unless the owner, within 15 years, has communicated in writing with the issuer concerning it or otherwise indicated an interest as evidenced by a memorandum or other record on file prepared by an employee of the issuer.

    (2) Subject to subsection (4), and except as otherwise provided in section 17a, any sum payable on a money order or similar written instrument, other than a third-party bank check, that is outstanding for more than 3 years after its issuance is presumed abandoned unless the owner, within 3 years, has communicated in writing with the issuer concerning it or otherwise indicated an interest as evidenced by a memorandum or other record on file prepared by an employee of the issuer.

    (3) A holder may not deduct from the amount of a travelers check or money order any charge imposed by reason of the failure to present the instrument for payment unless there is an enforceable written contract between the issuer and the owner of the instrument under which the issuer may impose a charge and the issuer regularly imposes such charges and does not regularly reverse or otherwise cancel them.

    (4) A sum payable on a travelers check, money order, or similar written instrument, other than a third-party bank check, described in subsections (1) and (2) may not be subjected to the custody of this state as unclaimed property unless 1 or more of the following requirements are met:

    (a) The records of the issuer show that the travelers check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased in this state.

    (b) The issuer has its principal place of business in this state and the records of the issuer do not show the state in which the travelers check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased.

    (c) The issuer has its principal place of business in this state, the records of the issuer show the state in which the travelers check, money order, or similar written instrument was purchased and the laws of the state of purchase do not provide for the escheat or custodial taking of the property or its escheat or unclaimed property law is not applicable to the property.

    (5) Notwithstanding any other provision of this act, subsection (4) applies to sums payable on travelers checks, money orders, and similar written instruments presumed abandoned on or after February 1, 1965, except to the extent that those sums have been paid over to a state before January 1, 1974.

    

    

History: 1995, Act 29, Eff. Mar. 28, 1996 ;-- Am. 2010, Act 197, Imd. Eff. Oct. 5, 2010 ;-- Am. 2024, Act 101, Imd. Eff. July 23, 2024

Compiler's Notes:

    Enacting section 1 of Act 197 of 2010 provides:

    "Enacting section 1. This amendatory act applies to property presumed abandoned and subject to the state's custody as unclaimed property under this act reportable to the state for any period ending after June 30, 2010."

    Enacting section 1 of Act 101 of 2024 provides:

    "Enacting section 1. This amendatory act applies to property that is presumed abandoned and subject to this state's custody as unclaimed property on or after the effective date of this amendatory act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: Flint Cold Storage v. Dep't of Treasury, 776 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
Flint Cold Storage v. Dep't of Treasury, 776 N.W.2d 387 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “See MCL 567.225 through 567.237. Of particular relevance here, funds that are “distributable in the course of the demutualization of an insurance company” are presumed abandoned “2 years after the date of the demutualization, if the funds remain unclaimed and the owner has not…”
Lisa Kemerer v. State of Michigan (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “After identifying various properties and the time frame for a presumption of abandonment, MCL 567.225 through MCL567.237, MCL 567.238(1) and (2) delineate the obligation on the holder of presumed abandoned property to provide a report including any identifying information of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.