Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 6 / Act 62 of 1872
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.13 (2026)

Impeachment; powers of managers, rights of process.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS


Act 62 of 1872


6.13 Impeachment; powers of managers, rights of process.

Sec. 13.

    The managers elected by the house of representatives, shall have all necessary powers for conducting the trial of impeachments before the senate, and they, and also the person impeached, shall severally be entitled to process for compelling the attendance of persons, or the production of papers and records required for the trial of the impeachment.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 62 ;-- CL 1897, 30 ;-- CL 1915, 44 ;-- CL 1929, 71 ;-- CL 1948, 6.13

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1965–2023 · leading case: Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978). · cites it 6× “Davis, Administrative Law of the Seventies, § 6.13 (collecting cases). Second, the present system of rate regulation denies due process to the motorist attacking the validity of a rate.”
Heath Twp. v. Sall, 502 N.W.2d 627 (Mich. 1993). · cites it 2× “" 1 Anderson, American Law of Zoning, 3d, § 6.13, p 478 (citations omitted). A finding of good faith, however, is seriously undermined if a landowner is on notice "of a proposed change in the zoning ordinance.”
In Re Jones, 152 B.R. 155 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1993). “The debtor may already have included a provision in the plan serving that objective, for fear that “[t]he vesting of property of the estate in the debtor at confirmation under § 1327(b) may have the effect of dissolving the automatic stay of actions against the property vesting…”
Kersheske v. Twp. of Thomas, 138 N.W.2d 509 (Mich. Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “Section 6.13 of the ordinance provides: “Essential services shall be permitted as authorized and regulated by law and other ordinances of the township, it being the intention hereof to except essential services from the provisions of this ordinance.”
Can IV Packard Square LLC v. Packard Square LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “13 of the construction loan agreement, which gave defendant 30 days to discharge a lien, provide plaintiff with a surety bond covering the lien, or provide assurances deemed acceptable to plaintiff in its sole discretion. Defendant notes that this action was filed less than 30…”
West St Joseph Prop. LLC v. Delta Twp. (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “” Similarly, despite appearing in the lease’s table of contents, sections 6.13 (regarding “Transfer of title free and clear”) and 6.”
Channel View East Condo. Assoc Inc v. Gregory v. Ferguson (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “Further, we note that the trial court relied on 1 Restatement of Property, 3d, Servitudes, § 6.13 as persuasive authority for the importance of fines as deterrence and as a less drastic alternative to legal proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.