Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.15 (2026)

Impeachment; compensation of members of court, managers, and other officers; payment.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS

Act 62 of 1872

6.15 Impeachment; compensation of members of court, managers, and other officers; payment.

Sec. 15.

The presiding officer and members of the senate, while sitting as a court of impeachment, and the managers elected by the house, shall receive the sum of 5 dollars each per day, and mileage at the rate of 10 cents per mile in going from and returning to their places of residence by the ordinarily traveled routes; and the compensation of the secretary, sergeant-at-arms, and all subordinate officers, clerks, and reporters, shall be an amount as shall be established by the vote of the members of the court. The state treasurer shall, upon presentation of a certificate or certificates signed by the presiding officer and secretary of the senate pay all the expenses of the senate and managers elected by the house, which may be incurred under this act.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 64 ;-- CL 1897, 32 ;-- CL 1915, 46 ;-- CL 1929, 73 ;-- CL 1948, 6.15 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 364, Imd. Eff. May 23, 2002

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1978–2016 · leading case: Grand Haven Twp. v. Brummel, 274 N.W.2d 814 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Grand Haven Twp. v. Brummel, 274 N.W.2d 814 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). “The rule extends when the parties labor under a mistake of fact as well as law, 1 Anderson, American Law of Zoning (2d ed), § 6.15, pp 386, 388, and has been held to apply even when the ordinance violator acts in good faith, expending money or incurring obligations, in reliance…”

Gary Goldberg v. First Holding Mgmt. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “The Manager of the Company shall be First Holding Manager LLC (“FHM”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.