Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 6 / Act 62 of 1872
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3 (2026)

Impeachment; prosecution by house.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

IMPEACHMENTS


Act 62 of 1872


6.3 Impeachment; prosecution by house.

Sec. 3.

    When an impeachment is directed, the house of representatives shall elect from their own body 3 members, whose duty it shall be to prosecute such impeachment, and the house of representatives are hereby authorized to empower the said managers to prepare and present articles of impeachment in accordance with resolutions of said house.

History: 1872, Act 62, Imd. Eff. Mar. 30, 1872 ;-- How. 52 ;-- CL 1897, 20 ;-- CL 1915, 34 ;-- CL 1929, 61 ;-- CL 1948, 6.3

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 30 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case: People v. Cipriano, 429 N.W.2d 781 (Mich. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Cipriano, 429 N.W.2d 781 (Mich. 1988). · cites it 4× “[2] For a general discussion of the McNabb-Mallory rule, see Keene, The ill-advised state court revival of the McNabb-Mallory rule, 72 J Crim L & Criminology 204 (1981); note, 18 USC § 3501 and the admissibility of confessions obtained during unnecessary prearraignment delay, 84…”
Raska v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins., 314 N.W.2d 440 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 2× “Keeton, Basic Text on Insurance Law, § 6.3(a), pp 353-356. [2] By this discussion we do not wish to imply that a finding of ambiguity in relevant policy provisions as required as a condition precedent for a determination of "reasonable expectations".”
United Am. Healthcare Corp. v. Backs, 997 F. Supp. 2d 741 (E.D. Mich. 2014). · cites it 4× “” (SPA section 6.3(a), attached to Pl.’s Compl. at Ex.”
People v. Gray, 577 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 1998). · cites it 2× “” Sobel, Eyewitness Identification, supra at § 6.3, p 6-8. Generally, courts have found that the longer the crime, the better the witness’ opportunity to observe.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 255 B.R. 445 (E.D. Mich. 2000). · cites it 2× “Paragraph 4 of Section 6.3 of the B.C. Agreement does not provide the Canadian provinces recourse against Dow Corning if the settling Personal Injury Claimant fails to notify the B.”
People v. Cain, 605 N.W.2d 28 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “9 See generally LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 6.3(a), *118 p 511; People v Jacoboni, 34 Mich App 84 ; 190 NW2d 720 (1971).”
Allstate Ins. v. Keillor, 537 N.W.2d 589 (Mich. 1995). · cites it 2× “[11] Keeton & Widiss, Insurance Law, § 6.3, p 633. [12] argument that it has no duty to defend its insured is based solely on the argument that there is coverage by United, Coverage "E" of the Aetna policy also provides personal liability insurance.”
Bradley v. Mid-Century Ins., 294 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. 1980). “69 Professor Keeton states the following principle: "The objectively reasonable expectations of applicants and intended beneficiaries regarding the terms of insurance contracts will be honored even though painstaking study of the policy provisions would have negated those…”
Valeck v. Watson Wyatt & Co., 266 F. Supp. 2d 610 (E.D. Mich. 2003). · cites it 2× “154 § 6.3. Disability retirement benefit payments can begin after the maximum 180-day period for receiving short-term disability expires, and without regard to the disabled employee’s age.”
People v. Jones, 504 N.W.2d 158 (Mich. 1993). “20 *103 At common law, a defendant charged with the commission of a crime could not be convicted of an attempt to commit that crime; and some courts have held that where the proofs establish a completed crime, the defendant may not be convicted of only an attempt to commit that…”
People v. Olsonite Corp., 265 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 5× “The offensive nature of the violations charged was odor, which being non-sulphuric in nature, was not chargeable under § 6.3. According to plaintiff, most odors, being invisible, are difficult to define and hence are chargeable under the comprehensive language of 6.”
Hochstein v. Microsoft Corp., 730 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Mich. 2010). “See also Harmon, Patents & the Federal Circuit, supra, at § 6.3(a)®, pp. 368-369 (“lexicography does not require a statement in the form T define_ to mean_.”
Show all 30 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3(a) — 9 cases
Raska v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins., 314 N.W.2d 440 (Mich. 1982). “Keeton, Basic Text on Insurance Law, § 6.3(a), pp 353-356. [2] By this discussion we do not wish to imply that a finding of ambiguity in relevant policy provisions as required as a condition precedent for a determination of "reasonable expectations".”
People v. Cain, 605 N.W.2d 28 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “9 See generally LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 6.3(a), *118 p 511; People v Jacoboni, 34 Mich App 84 ; 190 NW2d 720 (1971).”
United Am. Healthcare Corp. v. Backs, 997 F. Supp. 2d 741 (E.D. Mich. 2014). “” (SPA section 6.3(a), attached to Pl.’s Compl. at Ex.”
People v. Gray, 577 N.W.2d 92 (Mich. 1998). “” Sobel, Eyewitness Identification, supra at § 6.3, p 6-8. Generally, courts have found that the longer the crime, the better the witness’ opportunity to observe.”
Bradley v. Mid-Century Ins., 294 N.W.2d 141 (Mich. 1980). “69 Professor Keeton states the following principle: "The objectively reasonable expectations of applicants and intended beneficiaries regarding the terms of insurance contracts will be honored even though painstaking study of the policy provisions would have negated those…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3(b) — 1 case
United Am. Healthcare Corp. v. Backs, 997 F. Supp. 2d 741 (E.D. Mich. 2014). “” (SPA section 6.3(a), attached to Pl.’s Compl. at Ex.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3(b)(1)(B) — 1 case
Valeck v. Watson Wyatt & Co., 266 F. Supp. 2d 610 (E.D. Mich. 2003). “154 § 6.3. Disability retirement benefit payments can begin after the maximum 180-day period for receiving short-term disability expires, and without regard to the disabled employee’s age.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3(c) — 1 case
Off. Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Apex Global Info. Servs., Inc. v. Qwest Commc'ns Corp., 405 B.R. 234 (E.D. Mich. 2009).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 6.3(j) — 1 case
S & S Builders Inc v. Kings Lane Ltd Dividend Hous. Assn Lp (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.