Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2167 (2026)
Repealed. 2014, Act 124, Imd. Eff. May 20, 2014.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.2167 Repealed. 2014, Act 124, Imd. Eff. May 20, 2014.
Repealed. 2014, Act 124, Imd. Eff. May 20, 2014.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to receipt of technician's report in evidence.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1979–2017 · leading case: People v. Anderson, 276 N.W.2d 924 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
People v. Anderson, 276 N.W.2d 924 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “"(1) In a preliminary examination or grand jury proceeding, a report of the findings of a technician of the division of crime detection of the department of public health or a technician of the scientific laboratory section of the department of state police, signed by that…”
People of Michigan v. Timothy Matthew Parker (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “11b was amended,2 we see nothing in the code or public act to suggest that the Legislature was no longer concerned about burdening laboratory technicians’ resources.”
People of Michigan v. Timothy Matthew Parker (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “11b was amended,2 we see nothing in the code or public act to suggest that the Legislature was no longer concerned about burdening laboratory technicians’ resources.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2167(4) — 3 cases
People v. Anderson, 276 N.W.2d 924 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “"(1) In a preliminary examination or grand jury proceeding, a report of the findings of a technician of the division of crime detection of the department of public health or a technician of the scientific laboratory section of the department of state police, signed by that…”
People of Michigan v. Timothy Matthew Parker (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “11b was amended,2 we see nothing in the code or public act to suggest that the Legislature was no longer concerned about burdening laboratory technicians’ resources.”
People of Michigan v. Timothy Matthew Parker (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “11b was amended,2 we see nothing in the code or public act to suggest that the Legislature was no longer concerned about burdening laboratory technicians’ resources.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.