Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 (2026)

Repealed. 2014, Act 125, Eff. June 19, 2014.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.3205 Repealed. 2014, Act 125, Eff. June 19, 2014.

    Repealed. 2014, Act 125, Eff. June 19, 2014.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed section pertained to designation of individual to serve as contact.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 33 cases, 2012–2020 · leading case: Barbara Campbell v. Nationstar Mortg., 611 F. App'x 288 (6th Cir. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Barbara Campbell v. Nationstar Mortg., 611 F. App'x 288 (6th Cir. 2015). · cites it 6× “Campbell filed her complaint in Wayne County Circuit Court on January 13, 2014, alleging four causes of action: (1) Violation of Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 et seq. as to Nationstar, (2) Violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RES-PA”), Regulation X, and 12 C.”
Lucretia Holliday v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 569 F. App'x 366 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 4× “On January 30, 2013, Holliday filed a Complaint in Oakland County Circuit Court on four counts: quiet title; illegal foreclosure by advertisement; lack of capacity/ownership/privity; and breach of Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 . Wells Fargo removed the case to the Eastern District…”
Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 996 F. Supp. 2d 574 (E.D. Mich. 2014). · cites it 3× “249(3) by filing a fraudulent Sheriff Deed and stating no way could Plaintiffis) get a loan Modification because there if was [sic] no valid loan to modify this is a genuine issue of material fact.”
James Smith v. Bank of Am. Corp., 485 F. App'x 749 (6th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 (c). The mortgage holder or servicer then “shall provide the borrower with a copy of any calculation made” under the law.”
Robert Goss, Jr. v. ABN AMRO Mortg. Grp., 549 F. App'x 466 (6th Cir. 2013). · cites it 6× “371 (Count IV); that CMI breached the contract under the TPP (Count V); that, under promissory estoppel, the court should grant injunctive relief — -to wit, declaring the sheriffs sale void, enjoining summary proceedings, enforcing the TPP, and demanding an issuance of a…”
Conlin v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 714 F.3d 355 (6th Cir. 2013). “” Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 (3)(b)-(c); cf.”
McCann v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 873 F. Supp. 2d 823 (E.D. Mich. 2012). · cites it 4× “Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3204 . “Mortgage holder” is defined as “the owner of the indebtedness or of an interest in the indebtedness that is secured by the mortgage.”
Gary Thompson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, 563 F. App'x 440 (6th Cir. 2014). · cites it 3× “Plaintiff brought three counts against defendants arising out of the alleged improper foreclosure proceedings: (1) quiet title (Count I); (2) breach of Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 (Count II); and (3) injunctive relief (Count III).”
Garcia v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 782 F.3d 736 (6th Cir. 2015). “2932 ; (2) violations of Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Rights; (3) illegal/improper foreclosure and sheriffs sale pursuant to Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3204 ; and (4) violation of Mich.”
Lyons v. Trott & Trott, 905 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Mich. 2012). · cites it 13× “) Additionally, notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiff alleges that she did timely seek assistance from a housing counselor, Plaintiff states that the foreclosure prevention notice she received did not comply with the requirements of Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 regarding…”
Roderick Ray v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 627 F. App'x 452 (6th Cir. 2015). · cites it 4× “Bank, seeking to have the foreclosure sale set aside: (I) violation of Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 , et seq., now repealed, but which at the time governed the loan modification process; (II) violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RES- *454 PA”) regulation 12 C.”
Patrick Rugiero v. Nationstar Mtg LLC, 580 F. App'x 376 (6th Cir. 2014). “3205c(8) for Northstar’s alleged noncompliance with the notice provision required by Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205 (a). As a remedy, Rugiero asks the court to convert the foreclosure by advertisement into a judicial foreclosure.”
Show all 33 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(5) — 2 cases
Samuel L Hill Jr v. US Bank Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Samuel L Hill Jr v. US Bank Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(a) — 1 case
Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A., 996 F. Supp. 2d 574 (E.D. Mich. 2014). “249(3) by filing a fraudulent Sheriff Deed and stating no way could Plaintiffis) get a loan Modification because there if was [sic] no valid loan to modify this is a genuine issue of material fact.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(a)(1)(c) — 1 case
Nancy J Gardner v. Potestivo & Assocs. Pc (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(a)(3) — 2 cases
Llanos E Venegar v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
Llanos E Venegar v. Fifth Third Mortg. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2017).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(c)(5) — 2 cases
Samuel L Hill Jr v. US Bank Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Samuel L Hill Jr v. US Bank Na (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3205(l)(g) — 1 case
Henson v. Bank of Am., N.A., 979 F. Supp. 2d 763 (E.D. Mich. 2013).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.