Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3264 (2026)
Affidavits to perpetuate evidence of sale; record; evidence.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.3264 Affidavits to perpetuate evidence of sale; record; evidence.
Sec. 3264.
Such affidavits shall be recorded at length by the register of deeds of the county in which the premises are situated, in a book kept for the record of deeds; and such original affidavits, the record thereof, and certified copies of such record, shall be presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained.
History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 2014–2020 · leading case: Tom Farnsworth v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 569 F. App'x 421 (6th Cir. 2014).
Tom Farnsworth v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 569 F. App'x 421 (6th Cir. 2014). “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3264 ; Prudential Ins.”
HARRIS v. U.S. BANK Nat'l Ass'n, as Tr. for the Structured Asset Inv. Loan Trust Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-2 (E.D. Mich. 2020). “” Further, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3264 provides that such affidavits “shall be presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained.”
John C Tidwell v. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “It is undisputed that notice of the sale was published for four consecutive weeks in The News Herald and Press & Guide. Likewise, DeHaven’s affidavit of posting and his testimony at the evidentiary hearing established that DeHaven posted a printed copy of the notice in a…”
Fannetta Watson v. Comerica Bank (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” Under MCL 600.3264, these affidavits may be recorded by the register of deeds and “shall be presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained.”
Fannetta Watson v. Comerica Bank (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” Under MCL 600.3264, these affidavits may be recorded by the register of deeds and “shall be presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained.”
Sherry Acoff v. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 600.3264. And the affidavit by plaintiff Sherry Acoff, wherein she averred that she never saw any posted notice, is not duly notarized.”
Sherry Acoff v. US Bank Nat'l Ass'n (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “” MCL 600.3264. And the affidavit by plaintiff Sherry Acoff, wherein she averred that she never saw any posted notice, is not duly notarized.”
Joseph S Melnychenko v. Carrington Mortg. Servs. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “3256(1)(c), which is “presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained,” MCL 600.3264. In other words, that affidavit was presumptive evidence that defendant complied with the posted-notice requirement set forth in MCL 600.”
Joseph S Melnychenko v. Carrington Mortg. Servs. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “3256(1)(c), which is “presumptive evidence of the facts therein contained,” MCL 600.3264. In other words, that affidavit was presumptive evidence that defendant complied with the posted-notice requirement set forth in MCL 600.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.