Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3324 (2026)
Lands held in trust; parties; division among heirs or devisees.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.3324 Lands held in trust; parties; division among heirs or devisees.
Sec. 3324.
(1) The provisions concerning partition are applicable to lands held by a trustee for the benefit of others, and a claim for partition may be instituted by the trustees or any person interested in the lands held in trust.
(2) When the original parties in interest in the trust, or any of them, have died, leaving heirs or legatees or others interested by title or right through them or any of them in the lands held in trust, the court, at its discretion, may divide the land by judgment among the heirs, legatees, or others representing the interests of the deceased in those lands so as to set off the interest of all of these persons together, without subdivision among them.
History: 1961, Act 236, Eff. Jan. 1, 1963
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2008–2008 · leading case: In Re Temple Marital Trust, 748 N.W.2d 265 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
In Re Temple Marital Trust, 748 N.W.2d 265 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “3304 and MCL 600.3324(1), the latter of which provides: “The provisions concerning partition are applicable to lands held by a trustee for the benefit of others, and a claim for partition may be instituted by the trustees or any person interested in the lands held in trust.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.3324(1) — 1 case
In Re Temple Marital Trust, 748 N.W.2d 265 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “3304 and MCL 600.3324(1), the latter of which provides: “The provisions concerning partition are applicable to lands held by a trustee for the benefit of others, and a claim for partition may be instituted by the trustees or any person interested in the lands held in trust.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.