Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5704 (2026)
Jurisdiction.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.5704 Jurisdiction.
Sec. 5704.
The district court, municipal courts and the common pleas court of Detroit have jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under this chapter.
History: Add. 1972, Act 120, Eff. July 1, 1972
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (8 in the last 5 years), 1987–2026 · leading case: Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996).
Flynn v Korneffel, 547 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 1996). “§ 600.5704; M.S.A. § 27A.5704. Plaintiffs, however, attempted to enforce their right of redemption by commencing the circuit court action.”
Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Ass'n v. Kelley, 858 N.W.2d 69 (Mich. Ct. App. 2014). “On May 1, 2012, after expiration of the statutory redemption period, Freddie Mac initiated eviction proceedings in district court pursuant to MCL 600.5704. Defendants challenged the foreclosure, arguing in part that the foreclosure violated their Fifth Amendment due process…”
Galper v. United States Shoe Corp., 815 F. Supp. 1037 (E.D. Mich. 1993). “In support of this argument, defendants rely on Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 600.5704 (1979), which provides^ “The district court, municipal courts and the common pleas court of Detroit have jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under this chapter.”
Ames v. Maxson, 403 N.W.2d 501 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “Jurisdiction over such summary proceedings is vested in the district courts, MCL 600.5704; MSA 27A.5704. Recovery of possession after forfeiture of an executory land contract is provided for by MCL 600.”
Gary v. Hixon v. Westwick Square Coop. (Mich. Ct. App. 2021). “3 Pertinent to this case, MCL 600.5704 provides, in relevant part, as follows: The district court, municipal courts and the common pleas court of Detroit have jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under this chapter.”
Bertha Baldwin v. Michael Edward Williams (Mich. Ct. App. 2026). “Rather, pursuant to MCL 600.5704, a district court has jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of property and plaintiff filed a complaint to recover possession of the property.”
Buckley v. All Occupants of (E.D. Mich. 2025). “, Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5704 ; Mich. Ct. R.”
in Re Est. of Kenneth Waller (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “” MCL 600.5704. “‘Summary proceedings’ means a civil action to recover possession of premises and to obtain certain ancillary relief as provided by this chapter and by court rules adopted in connection therewith.”
Bob Woodward v. Christopher Schwartz (Mich. Ct. App. 2020). “Chaban generally relies on MCL 600.5704, a provision of the Summary Proceedings Act, MCL 600.”
Rovin Vinod v. Pauline Props. LLC (Mich. Ct. App. 2022). “Under MCL 600.5704, district courts, municipal courts and the common pleas court of Detroit have jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of premises pursuant to the provisions of MCL 600.”
20230105_C359427_36_359427.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “First, defendant asserted that the circuit court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the matter because the district courts have jurisdiction over summary proceedings to recover possession of premises under MCL 600.5704. Second, defendant asserted that plaintiff did not…”
Robert Briggs v. Vanessa Mason (Mich. Ct. App. 2023). “6 We recognize that the rental agreement between Small and defendants also contained an agreement to sell the property to defendants, which was not exercised.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.