Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.6419a (2026)

Repealed. 2013, Act 164, Imd. Eff. Nov. 12, 2013.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961

Act 236 of 1961

600.6419a Repealed. 2013, Act 164, Imd. Eff. Nov. 12, 2013.

Repealed. 2013, Act 164, Imd. Eff. Nov. 12, 2013.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to court of claims concurrent jurisdiction of any demand for equitable and declaratory relief ancillary to claim filed pursuant to MCL 600.605.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 16 cases, 1988–2016 · leading case: Parkwood Ltd. Dividend Hous. Ass'n v. State Hous. Dev. Auth., 664 N.W.2d 185 (Mich. 2003).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Parkwood Ltd. Dividend Hous. Ass'n v. State Hous. Dev. Auth., 664 N.W.2d 185 (Mich. 2003). · cites it 8× “5 Additionally, MCL 600.6419a, which was added in 1984, gives the Court of Claims concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit courts over any claim for equitable and declaratory relief that is ancillary to a claim filed under § 6419: In addition to the powers and jurisdiction…”

Silverman v. Univ. of Michigan Bd. of Regents, 516 N.W.2d 54 (Mich. 1994). · cites it 18× “6419 provides: (1) Except as provided in [MCL 600.6419a; MSA *213 27A.6419(1)] and [MCL 600.”

Duncan v. State, 774 N.W.2d 89 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “6419 provides in pertinent part: (1) Except as provided in [MCL 600.6419a] and [MCL 600.6440], the jurisdiction of the court of claims, as conferred upon it by this chapter, shall be exclusive.”

O’connell v. Dir. of Elections, 891 N.W.2d 240 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “6419a, which, before its repeal by 2013 PA 164 , conferred on “the Court of Claims concurrent jurisdiction with the circuit courts over any claim for equitable and declaratory relief that is ancillary to a claim filed under § 6419.” Id. At issue in Parkwood was whether the Court…”

Mooahesh v. Dep't of Treasury, 492 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 3× “6419 pertinent to the present dispute provide: *558 Except as provided in [MCL 600.6419a; MSA 27A.6419a and MCL 600.”

AFSCME Council 25 v. State Employees' Ret. Sys., 294 Mich. App. 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “MCL 600.6419a. The determination whether the Court of Claims possesses jurisdiction is governed by the actual nature of the claim, not how the parties phrase the request for relief or the characterization of the nature of the relief.”

River Inv. Grp. LLC v. Casab, 797 N.W.2d 1 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “The state administrative board is hereby vested with discretionary authority upon the advice of the attorney general, to hear, consider, determine, and allow any claim against the state in an amount less than $1,000.”

77th Dist. Judge v. State, 438 N.W.2d 333 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “6419(1), the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction to "hear and determine all claims and demands, liquidated and unliquidated, ex contractu and ex delicto, against the state and any of its departments, commissions, boards, institutions, arms, or agencies.”

Oakland Cnty. v. Dep't of Human Servs., 799 N.W.2d 566 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 12× “The court has power and jurisdiction: (a) To hear and determine all claims and demands, liquidated and unliquidated, ex contractu and ex delicto, against the state and any of its departments, commissions, boards, institutions, arms, or agencies.”

Pomann, Callanan & Sofen, PC v. Wayne Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 419 N.W.2d 787 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “MCL 600.6419a; MSA 27A.6419(1). The Court of Claims Act affirms the continued availability of circuit court jurisdiction over proceedings for strictly equitable relief.”

AuSable Manistee Action Council, Inc. v. State, 452 N.W.2d 832 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “6419(1), which provides that the Court of Claims also has jurisdiction concurrent with the circuit court over any action for equitable or declaratory relief ancillary to a claim filed pursuant to MCL 600.6419; MSA 27A.6419 (i.e., ancillary to a claim for money damages).”

Behnke, Inc. v. State, 748 N.W.2d 253 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “Even assuming that the Court of Claims has jurisdiction, MCL 600.6419a provides that “jurisdiction conferred by this section [to the court of claims] is not intended to be exclusive of the jurisdiction of the circuit court over demands for declaratory and equitable relief…”

Show all 16 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.