Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 600 / Act 236 of 1961
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.8261 (2026)

Court facilities.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.8261 Court facilities.

Sec. 8261.

    Court facilities shall be provided at those places where the court sits. In districts of the first and second class they shall be provided by the county and in districts of the third class they shall be provided by each political subdivision where the court sits.

History: Add. 1968, Act 154, Imd. Eff. June 17, 1968

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1971–2015 · leading case: Judges of the 74th Jud. Dist. v. Bay Cnty., 190 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Judges of the 74th Jud. Dist. v. Bay Cnty., 190 N.W.2d 219 (Mich. 1971). · cites it 2× “Appropriations by the district control unit must be made for this statutory purpose, and not for limited or specified line-items, except where the law provides otherwise, as, for example, facilities, MCLA §§ 600.8261, 600.8262, 600.8263 (Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp §§ 27A.”
Ottawa Cnty. Controller v. Ottawa Prob. Judge, 401 N.W.2d 869 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “Appropriations by the district control unit must be made for this statutory purpose, and not for limited or specified line-items, except where the law provides otherwise, as, for example, facilities, MCL 600.8261, 600.8262, 600.8263; MSA 27A.”
City of Huntington Woods v. City of Oak Park, 874 N.W.2d 214 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “MCL 600.8261 provides that “[c]ourt facilities shall be provided at those places where the court sits.”
City of Rockford v. 63rd Dist. Court, 781 N.W.2d 145 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “8104, MCL 600.8261, acquired property in Grand Rapids Township near the East Beltline and Knapp Street with plans to consolidate both divisions of the court into a new facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.