Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.8391 (2026)

Traffic bureau; establishment; administration; purpose; authority over personnel; location and number of offices; appeals.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961


Act 236 of 1961


600.8391 Traffic bureau; establishment; administration; purpose; authority over personnel; location and number of offices; appeals.

Sec. 8391.

    With the approval of the governing body of a district control unit, the district court may establish within the court a traffic bureau which may be administered by clerks or other personnel of the district court to accept, as authorized by the judges of the district, admissions for civil infractions under Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1949, as amended, being sections 257.1 to 257.923 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, or a local ordinance corresponding thereto, and to collect civil fines and costs as prescribed by the judges of the district. Beginning August 1, 1979, a traffic bureau may also accept pleas of guilty for such traffic offenses as authorized by the judges of the district, except for violations of sections 625, 625b, 626, 626b, and 904 of Act No. 300 of the Public Acts of 1949, as amended, or a local ordinance corresponding thereto, and collect fines and costs as prescribed by the judges of the district, if the offense occurred before August 1, 1979 and if the maximum permissible punishment for the offense at the time the offense was committed did not exceed 90 days in jail or a fine of not more than $100.00, or both. The presiding judge of the district, subject to the supervision of the supreme court, shall have authority over the personnel and determine the location and number of traffic bureau offices. Appeals as of right may be taken from the traffic bureau to the district court. Appeals shall be taken within 7 days after the entry of the civil infraction admission and shall be heard de novo.

History: Add. 1968, Act 154, Imd. Eff. June 17, 1968 ;-- Am. 1978, Act 511, Eff. Aug. 1, 1979 ;-- Am. 1979, Act 67, Eff. Aug. 1, 1979

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1990 · leading case: People v. Courts, 257 N.W.2d 101 (Mich. 1977).
People v. Courts, 257 N.W.2d 101 (Mich. 1977). · cites it 3× “MCLA 600.8391; MSA 27A.8391 delineates the offenses which may be included in a trafile bureau schedule of fines, and includes those with a 90-day maximum jail term.”
People v. Courts, 247 N.W.2d 325 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “Pursuant to MCLA 600.8391; MSA 27A.8391 and DCR 1969, 2003.”
People v. Bogedain, 460 N.W.2d 328 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990). “MCL 600.8391; MSA 27A.8391. Defendant relied on People v Courts, 401 Mich 57, 61-62 ; 257 NW2d 101 (1977), where our Supreme Court stated: The establishment of a Traffic Violations Bureau and a scheduled fine system creates for the traffic court defendant a circumstance…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.