Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.8102 (2026)

Repeal of certain acts.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

ESTATES AND PROTECTED INDIVIDUALS CODE


Act 386 of 1998


700.8102 Repeal of certain acts.

Sec. 8102.

    The following acts and parts of acts are repealed:

    (a) Disclaimer of property interests act, 1996 PA 131, MCL 554.871 to 554.890.

    (b) Uniform testamentary additions to trusts act, 1962 PA 83, MCL 555.461 to 555.464.

    (c) Revised probate code, 1978 PA 642, MCL 700.1 to 700.993.

    (d) Uniform simultaneous death act, 1941 PA 73, MCL 720.101 to 720.108.

    (e) 1996 PA 433, MCL 451.471 to 451.481.

History: 1998, Act 386, Eff. Apr. 1, 2000

PopularName Notes:

EPIC
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2024 · leading case: Est. of Dale v. Robinson, 760 N.W.2d 557 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008).
Est. of Dale v. Robinson, 760 N.W.2d 557 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “MCL 700.8102(c). The Estates and Protected Individuals Code does not contain a provision similar to MCL 700.”
Braverman v. Garden City Hosp., 746 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 2008). “MCL 700.8102(c). The Estates and Protected Individuals Code does not contain a provision similar to MCL 700.”
Est. of Christopher P Eversole v. Janelle Nash (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “MCL 700.8102(c). -11- means to cure the initial lack of standing.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 700.8102(c) — 3 cases
Est. of Dale v. Robinson, 760 N.W.2d 557 (Mich. Ct. App. 2008). “MCL 700.8102(c). The Estates and Protected Individuals Code does not contain a provision similar to MCL 700.”
Braverman v. Garden City Hosp., 746 N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 2008). “MCL 700.8102(c). The Estates and Protected Individuals Code does not contain a provision similar to MCL 700.”
Est. of Christopher P Eversole v. Janelle Nash (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “MCL 700.8102(c). -11- means to cure the initial lack of standing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.