Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.3a (2026)

Repealed. 2001, Act 110, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

STATUS OF MINORS AND CHILD SUPPORT

Act 293 of 1968

722.3a Repealed. 2001, Act 110, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.

Repealed. 2001, Act 110, Eff. Sept. 30, 2001.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to child support after child reaches 18 years of age.

PopularName Notes:

Emancipation of Minors Act

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1998–2000 · leading case: McDougall v. Schanz, 597 N.W.2d 148 (Mich. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McDougall v. Schanz, 597 N.W.2d 148 (Mich. 1999). · cites it 2× “The difference between our approaches does not arise from any effort of mine to intrude upon the Legislature's domain, but rather from my refusal to allow the Legislature to intrude upon the judiciary's province.”

Phinisee v. Rogers, 582 N.W.2d 852 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “§ 722.3a; M.S.A. § 25.244(3a), which allows an award of support for a child who has reached eighteen years of age and is attending high school full time to continue until the child reaches the age of nineteen years and six months.”

In Re Juv. Commitment Costs, 613 N.W.2d 348 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “The 18 year and 19 and xk year age ceilings of MCL 722.3a[; MSA 25.244(3a)] are inconsistent with Macomb County’s position that a parent shall be ordered to pay reimbursement until their child reaches age 21, and none of the circumstances articulated in MCL 722.”

Sturak v. Ozomaro, 606 N.W.2d 411 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “MCL 722.3a; MSA 25.244(3a). Therefore, because it is the minor child’s right to and need for support that is primarily at issue and because a completely retroactive application of Crego III to every nonmodifiable § 3 support agreement entered since the enactment of § 3 in 1956…”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 722.3a(2) — 1 case

In Re Juv. Commitment Costs, 613 N.W.2d 348 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “The 18 year and 19 and xk year age ceilings of MCL 722.3a[; MSA 25.244(3a)] are inconsistent with Macomb County’s position that a parent shall be ordered to pay reimbursement until their child reaches age 21, and none of the circumstances articulated in MCL 722.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.