Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.236b (2026)

Computer-assisted shooting; prohibited conduct; definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE


Act 328 of 1931


750.236b Computer-assisted shooting; prohibited conduct; definitions.

Sec. 236b.

    (1) A person in this state shall not do any of the following:

    (a) Engage in computer-assisted shooting.

    (b) Provide or operate, with or without remuneration, facilities for computer-assisted shooting.

    (c) Provide or offer to provide, with or without remuneration, equipment specially adapted for computer-assisted shooting. This subdivision does not prohibit providing or offering to provide any of the following:

    (i) General-purpose equipment, including a computer, a camera, fencing, building materials, or a bow or crossbow.

    (ii) General-purpose computer software, including an operating system and communications programs.

    (iii) General telecommunications hardware or networking services for computers, including adapters, modems, servers, routers, and other facilities associated with internet access.

    (d) Provide or offer to provide, with or without remuneration, an animal for computer-assisted shooting.

    (2) As used in this section:

    (a) "Computer-assisted shooting" means the use of a computer or any other device, equipment, or software to remotely control the aiming and discharge of a bow or crossbow to kill an animal, whether or not the animal is located in this state.

    (b) "Facilities for computer-assisted remote shooting" includes real property and improvements on the property associated with computer-assisted shooting, such as hunting blinds, offices, and rooms equipped to facilitate computer-assisted shooting.

History: Add. 2005, Act 111, Imd. Eff. Sept. 22, 2005

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Ronald Anthony Dimambro Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
People of Michigan v. Ronald Anthony Dimambro Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “He was sentenced to life imprisonment for his first-degree felony murder conviction and 15 to 25 years’ imprisonment for his first-degree child abuse conviction, with 338 days of jail credit. While his appeal was pending, we granted his motion to remand this case for an…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.236b(2) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Ronald Anthony Dimambro Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “He was sentenced to life imprisonment for his first-degree felony murder conviction and 15 to 25 years’ imprisonment for his first-degree child abuse conviction, with 338 days of jail credit. While his appeal was pending, we granted his motion to remand this case for an…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.