Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 763 / Act 175 of 1927
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 763.11 (2026)

Duties of Michigan commission on law enforcement standards; appropriation of funds; implementation of MCL 763.7 to 763.10; compliance.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


763.11 Duties of Michigan commission on law enforcement standards; appropriation of funds; implementation of MCL 763.7 to 763.10; compliance.

Sec. 11.

    (1) The Michigan commission on law enforcement standards created under section 3 of the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards act, 1965 PA 203, MCL 28.603, shall set quality standards for the audiovisual recording of statements under section 8 of this chapter and standards for geographic accessibility of equipment in the state. The commission shall also conduct an assessment of the initial cost necessary for law enforcement agencies to purchase audiovisual recording equipment. The first assessment shall be conducted By July 26, 2012. The Michigan commission on law enforcement standards shall conduct subsequent assessments regarding the necessary costs of purchasing, upgrading, or replacing the equipment every 2 years.

    (2) The Michigan commission on law enforcement standards shall recommend to the legislature each year an annual appropriation amount to be determined by the commission's assessment performed under this section. The legislature shall annually appropriate funds to the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards for distribution to law enforcement agencies throughout the state to allow the agencies to purchase audiovisual recording equipment for purposes of this chapter. Any funds appropriated for this purpose shall be in addition to the appropriations provided to the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards and the department of state police in the immediately preceding fiscal year and shall not be appropriated from the Michigan justice training fund created in 1982 PA 302, MCL 18.421 to 18.430, or the department of state police budget.

    (3) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (4), law enforcement agencies shall implement sections 7 to 10 of this chapter and this section within 120 days after receiving funds under this section from the Michigan commission on law enforcement standards or acquiring access to audiovisual recording equipment as directed by the standards set forth by that commission.

    (4) Notwithstanding subsection (3), a law enforcement agency shall comply with the provisions of the amendatory act that added this subsection within 60 days after the date the commission adopts the standards for audiovisual recording equipment required by this section if the law enforcement agency has audiovisual recording equipment that complies with those standards on that date, or within 60 days after the date the law enforcement agency subsequently obtains audiovisual recording equipment that complies with the adopted standards.

History: Add. 2012, Act 479, Eff. Mar. 28, 2013 ;-- Am. 2016, Act 293, Eff. Jan. 2, 2017

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2015–2017 · leading case: People of Michigan v. Deshawn Outtoee (Mich. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People of Michigan v. Deshawn Outtoee (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “8(1) cross-references, MCL 763.11 provides: (1) The commission on law enforcement standards .”
People of Michigan v. Ronald Parker Wilson (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “] Although Darnell is correct that the cited statutory scheme became effective before his arrest and interrogation on April 1, 2013, he fails to recognize the prospective nature of the imposed requirements and the time frame delineated in MCL 763.11 for police departments to…”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff argues that, because police testimony established that the recording equipment was not properly storing videos and that the recording of defendant’s interrogation could not be accessed, the recording equipment was not “operational or accessible” as provided in MCL…”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff argues that, because police testimony established that the recording equipment was not properly storing videos and that the recording of defendant’s interrogation could not be accessed, the recording equipment was not “operational or accessible” as provided in MCL…”
People of Michigan v. Brandon Jacob Millay (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “MCL 763.11(4). Additionally, the statute gave a law enforcement agency 120 days to implement the recording requirements once it acquired recording equipment that complied with the standards or once it received funds for compliant recording equipment.”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “8 MCL 763.11(3) and (4) directs that MCL 763.”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “8 MCL 763.11(3) and (4) directs that MCL 763.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 763.11(1) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Ronald Parker Wilson (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “] Although Darnell is correct that the cited statutory scheme became effective before his arrest and interrogation on April 1, 2013, he fails to recognize the prospective nature of the imposed requirements and the time frame delineated in MCL 763.11 for police departments to…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 763.11(3) — 6 cases
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Plaintiff argues that, because police testimony established that the recording equipment was not properly storing videos and that the recording of defendant’s interrogation could not be accessed, the recording equipment was not “operational or accessible” as provided in MCL…”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “Plaintiff argues that, because police testimony established that the recording equipment was not properly storing videos and that the recording of defendant’s interrogation could not be accessed, the recording equipment was not “operational or accessible” as provided in MCL…”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “8 MCL 763.11(3) and (4) directs that MCL 763.”
People of Michigan v. Justin Milton Bell (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “8 MCL 763.11(3) and (4) directs that MCL 763.”
People of Michigan v. Deshawn Outtoee (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “8(1) cross-references, MCL 763.11 provides: (1) The commission on law enforcement standards .”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 763.11(4) — 3 cases
People of Michigan v. Brandon Jacob Millay (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “MCL 763.11(4). Additionally, the statute gave a law enforcement agency 120 days to implement the recording requirements once it acquired recording equipment that complied with the standards or once it received funds for compliant recording equipment.”
People of Michigan v. Deshawn Outtoee (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “8(1) cross-references, MCL 763.11 provides: (1) The commission on law enforcement standards .”
People of Michigan v. Ronald Parker Wilson (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “] Although Darnell is correct that the cited statutory scheme became effective before his arrest and interrogation on April 1, 2013, he fails to recognize the prospective nature of the imposed requirements and the time frame delineated in MCL 763.11 for police departments to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.