Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 767 / Act 175 of 1927
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a (2026)

Repealed. 1974, Act 258, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


Act 175 of 1927


767.27a Repealed. 1974, Act 258, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975.

    Repealed. 1974, Act 258, Eff. Aug. 6, 1975.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to persons incompetent to stand trial.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 86 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1968–2023 · leading case: People v. Lucas, 227 N.W.2d 763 (Mich. 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
People v. Lucas, 227 N.W.2d 763 (Mich. 1975). · cites it 12× “The Court of Appeals agreed with defendant that *527 no formal hearing as required was held but remanded for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing, stating: "[W]e remand with the instruction that a competency hearing be held pursuant to MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). If the results…”
People v. Dobben, 488 N.W.2d 726 (Mich. 1992). · cites it 6× “[10] The predecessor statute, MCL 767.27a(4); MSA 28.966(11)(4) provided: The diagnostic report and recommendations shall be admissible as evidence in the hearing [adjudicating competency to stand trial], but not for any other purpose in the pending criminal proceedings.”
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 11× “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
People v. Blocker, 227 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1975). · cites it 8× “II The statutory requirements and procedures governing the determination of a defendant’s competence to stand trial are found in MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11) and GCR 1963, 786.”
People v. Oliphant, 250 N.W.2d 443 (Mich. 1976). · cites it 2× “We hold that the testimony of the two witnesses was not inadmissible under the doctrine of collateral estoppel as embodied in the Fifth Amendment double jeopardy provisions.”
People v. Cole, 172 N.W.2d 354 (Mich. 1969). · cites it 4× “…266. For present relevant statutory provisions, see PA 1927, No 175, ch 7, §§ 27a, 27b, as added by PA 1966, No 266 (MCLA §§ 767.27a, 767.27b, Stat Ann 1969 Cum Supp §§ 28.966[11], 28.966[12]). The present statute provides for "treatment in an appropriate state hospital" and…”
People v. Martin, 192 N.W.2d 215 (Mich. 1971). · cites it 4× “(MCLA § 767.27a[3] [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.”
People v. McQuillan, 221 N.W.2d 569 (Mich. 1974). · cites it 4× “MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11) provides that a certified opinion by the Department of Mental Health that the defendant will not regain competence, in addition to a detailed psychiatric report, shall act as equivalents to a petition and physicians' report under MCLA 330.”
People v. Spry, 254 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11), provides in relevant part: "(2) The issue of competence to stand trial may be raised by the prosecuting attorney, defense counsel, by any interested person on leave of the court, or by the court on its own motion.”
People v. Matheson, 245 N.W.2d 551 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 4× “Although the examiner reported the presence of "moderate mental illness", he decided that the statutory test of competence had been satisfied, MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). [1] A hearing on the question was conducted on November 14, 1974.”
People v. Belanger, 252 N.W.2d 472 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “*442 It is important to note that defendant does not claim that the hearing of February 21, 1974 failed to comply with the statutory procedure for determining competency, MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). The week before trial, counsel for defendant filed a motion to determine…”
People v. Garland, 224 N.W.2d 45 (Mich. 1974). · cites it 6× “) The prosecutor appeals claiming "that Martin does not hold that psychiatrists from the forensic center who have conducted a psychiatric examination on the defendant pursuant to MCLA 767.27a; *221 MSA 28.966(11) are not allowed to testify at trial as to the issue of the…”
Show all 86 citing cases →
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(1) — 3 cases
People v. Matheson, 245 N.W.2d 551 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “Although the examiner reported the presence of "moderate mental illness", he decided that the statutory test of competence had been satisfied, MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). [1] A hearing on the question was conducted on November 14, 1974.”
People v. Tubbs, 236 N.W.2d 77 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
People v. Thompson, 217 N.W.2d 63 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(3) — 12 cases
People v. Blocker, 227 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1975). “II The statutory requirements and procedures governing the determination of a defendant’s competence to stand trial are found in MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11) and GCR 1963, 786.”
People v. Spry, 254 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11), provides in relevant part: "(2) The issue of competence to stand trial may be raised by the prosecuting attorney, defense counsel, by any interested person on leave of the court, or by the court on its own motion.”
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
People v. Parker, 227 N.W.2d 775 (Mich. 1975).
People v. McShan, 219 N.W.2d 792 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(4) — 21 cases
People v. Dobben, 488 N.W.2d 726 (Mich. 1992). “[10] The predecessor statute, MCL 767.27a(4); MSA 28.966(11)(4) provided: The diagnostic report and recommendations shall be admissible as evidence in the hearing [adjudicating competency to stand trial], but not for any other purpose in the pending criminal proceedings.”
People v. Lucas, 227 N.W.2d 763 (Mich. 1975). “The Court of Appeals agreed with defendant that *527 no formal hearing as required was held but remanded for a nunc pro tunc competency hearing, stating: "[W]e remand with the instruction that a competency hearing be held pursuant to MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). If the results…”
People v. Martin, 192 N.W.2d 215 (Mich. 1971). “(MCLA § 767.27a[3] [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 28.”
People v. Garland, 224 N.W.2d 45 (Mich. 1974). “) The prosecutor appeals claiming "that Martin does not hold that psychiatrists from the forensic center who have conducted a psychiatric examination on the defendant pursuant to MCLA 767.27a; *221 MSA 28.966(11) are not allowed to testify at trial as to the issue of the…”
People v. Alsteens, 212 N.W.2d 243 (Mich. Ct. App. 1973).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(5) — 1 case
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(6) — 3 cases
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
People v. Goodall, 194 N.W.2d 454 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).
People v. Walker, 237 N.W.2d 252 (Mich. Ct. App. 1975).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(7) — 1 case
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(8) — 1 case
People v. Miller, 489 N.W.2d 60 (Mich. 1992).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(9) — 3 cases
People v. Stange, 283 N.W.2d 806 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
People v. Miller, 489 N.W.2d 60 (Mich. 1992).
People v. Gravlin, 217 N.W.2d 404 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974).
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 767.27a(l) — 4 cases
People v. Matheson, 245 N.W.2d 551 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “Although the examiner reported the presence of "moderate mental illness", he decided that the statutory test of competence had been satisfied, MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11). [1] A hearing on the question was conducted on November 14, 1974.”
People v. Blocker, 227 N.W.2d 767 (Mich. 1975). “II The statutory requirements and procedures governing the determination of a defendant’s competence to stand trial are found in MCLA 767.27a; MSA 28.966(11) and GCR 1963, 786.”
People v. Hamm, 261 N.W.2d 288 (Mich. Ct. App. 1977). “Defendant first alleges that the trial court erred in determining him incompetent during the course of trial without affording him a hearing on that *286 issue.”
People v. Stripling, 245 N.W.2d 713 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.