Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.11
Chapters 1 to 199 of Michigan Compiled Laws; felonies to which chapter applicable.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Act 175 of 1927
777.11 Chapters 1 to 199 of Michigan Compiled Laws; felonies to which chapter applicable.
Sec. 11.
This chapter applies to felonies enumerated in chapters 1 to 199 of the Michigan Compiled Laws as set forth in sections 11a to 11e of this chapter.
History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998 ;-- Am. 1999, Act 90, Eff. Sept. 1, 1999 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 279, Eff. Oct. 1, 2000 ;-- Am. 2000, Act 492, Eff. July 1, 2001 ;-- Am. 2001, Act 150, Eff. Jan. 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2001, Act 154, Eff. Jan. 1, 2002 ;-- Am. 2002, Act 31, Eff. Apr. 1, 2002
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 53
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2001–2024 · leading case: People v. Bonilla-Machado
People v. Bonilla-Machado (2011)
“MCL 777.11 through 777.19 place each felony covered by the guidelines within one of these six offense categories.”
People v. Allen (2016)
“36 The sentencing guidelines expressly assign felonies an offense category and offense class, and MCL 777.11 to MCL 777.18 give descriptions of the offenses and identify the statutory maximum terms of imprisonment.”
People v. Lockridge (2015)
“34(2), which provides in part: Except as otherwise provided in this subsection or for a departure from the appropriate minimum sentence range provided for under subsection (3), the minimum sentence imposed by a court of this state for a felony enumerated in [MCL 777.11 through…”
People v. Hardy; People v. Glenn (2013)
“The OV score is calculated by adding all the scores of all the applicable OVs. MCL 777.21(a). The upper-most range on each of the several charts is “100+ points,” and, therefore, any OV score of 100 points or above results in the same sentencing guidelines range.”
People v. Harper (2007)
“8(1), as listed in MCL 777.11 et seq., for the crime of which the defendant has been convicted.”
People v. Francisco (2006)
“STANDARD OF REVIEW The issues in this case concern the proper interpretation and application of the statutory sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.11 et seq., which are both legal questions that this Court reviews de novo.”
People v. Lowe (2009)
“It states that the minimum sentence for any felony included in part 2 of the sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.11 et seq., "shall be within the appropriate sentence range under the version of those sentencing guidelines in effect on the date the crime was committed," except "as…”
People v. McGraw (2009)
“Every offense to which the guidelines apply is listed in a rather voluminous part 2, comprising MCL 777.11 through 777.19. [20] When providing rules for guidelines scoring, the Legislature took pains to set forth step-by-step instructions, pointing with particularity to where…”
People v. Morson (2004)
“Additionally, the Court of Appeals concluded that defendant should have been assessed zero points on OV 9 because there was only one victim, not two. This Court granted the prosecution's application for leave to appeal.”
People v. Wiggins (2010)
“5 provides: The offense categories are designated in [MCL 777.11 et seq.] as follows: (a) Crimes against a person are designated “person”.”
People v. Ambrose (2016)
“Issues involving “the proper interpretation and application of the legislative sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.11 et seq. . . . are legal questions that this Court reviews de novo.”
People of Michigan v. Benjamin Keith McKewen (2018)
“5 5 In People v Sours, 315 Mich App 346, 348 ; 890 NW2d 401 (2016), this Court observed: Issues involving the proper interpretation and application of the legislative sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.11 et seq., are legal questions that this Court reviews de novo.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.