Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.67 (2026)
Minimum sentence ranges for class F.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Act 175 of 1927
777.67 Minimum sentence ranges for class F.
Sec. 67.
The following are the minimum sentence ranges for class F:
|
PRIOR RECORD VARIABLE LEVEL |
||||||
|
Offense Variable |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
|
Level |
0 |
1-9 |
10-24 |
25-49 |
50-74 |
75+ |
|
|
points |
points |
points |
points |
points |
points |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-9 points |
0-3 |
0-6 |
0-9 |
2-17 |
5-23 |
10-23 |
|
II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-34 points |
0-6 |
0-9 |
0-17 |
5-23 |
10-23 |
12-24 |
|
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35-74 points |
0-9 |
0-17 |
2-17 |
10-23 |
12-24 |
14-29 |
|
IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75+ points |
0-17 |
2-17 |
5-23 |
12-24 |
14-29 |
17-30 |
History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2006–2023 · leading case: People v. Johnson, 808 N.W.2d 815 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011).
People v. Johnson, 808 N.W.2d 815 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “…v Washington, 466 US 668, 687 ; 104 S Ct 2052 ; 80 L Ed 2d 674 (1984). MCL 777.56(1)(d). MCL 777.56(1) (b). MCL 777.67.”
People v. McCuller, 715 N.W.2d 798 (Mich. 2006). “MCL 777.67. All class E felonies fall in an intermediate sanction cell if the defendant has fewer than 25 PRV points.”
People v. Uphaus, 737 N.W.2d 519 (Mich. Ct. App. 2007). “See MCL 777.67. Because the upper limit of the recommended minimum sentence range was 18 months or less, defendant qualified for an intermediate sanction under MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Anthony Lamar Lyle Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “See MCL 777.67; MCL 777.21(3)(c); MCL 769.34(4)(c).”
People of Michigan v. Richard Marc Meyers (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “The trial court’s imposition of a 30-month minimum was thus a departure. It is clear, however, that the court did not understand that it was departing from the guideline range.”
People of Michigan v. Richard Marc Meyers (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “The trial court’s imposition of a 30-month minimum was thus a departure. It is clear, however, that the court did not understand that it was departing from the guideline range.”
People of Michigan v. Geraldine Galbraith Taeckens (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “…applicable to a non- habitual offender for a class F offense, which is 30 months’ imprisonment. See MCL 777.17d; MCL 777.67. -3-”
People of Michigan v. Geraldine Galbraith Taeckens (Mich. Ct. App. 2017). “…applicable to a non- habitual offender for a class F offense, which is 30 months’ imprisonment. See MCL 777.17d; MCL 777.67. -3-”
People of Michigan v. Kenneth Daniel Brunke (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “See MCL 777.67. Defendant’s OV level remains at level III.”
People of Michigan v. Kenneth Daniel Brunke (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “See MCL 777.67. Defendant’s OV level remains at level III.”
People of Michigan v. Melissa Ann West (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “THE FELONIOUS ASSAULT SENTENCES In the felonious assault case, defendant challenges the reasonableness of the trial court’s sentences of five to eight years for her convictions of felonious assault.”
People of Michigan v. Celene Ann Artinian (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Although Andrew also claims that Celene was more suited to leadership because he was hampered by a heroin addiction, Celene told the police that Andrew had not been using heroin because growing marijuana helped him avoid that addiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.