Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.68 (2026)
Minimum sentence ranges for class G.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Act 175 of 1927
777.68 Minimum sentence ranges for class G.
Sec. 68.
The following are the minimum sentence ranges for class G:
|
PRIOR RECORD VARIABLE LEVEL |
||||||
|
Offense Variable |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
|
Level |
0 |
1-9 |
10-24 |
25-49 |
50-74 |
75+ |
|
|
points |
points |
points |
points |
points |
points |
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-9 points |
0-3 |
0-6 |
0-9 |
0-11 |
0-17 |
2-17 |
|
II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-15 points |
0-6 |
0-9 |
0-11 |
0-17 |
2-17 |
5-23 |
|
III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16+ points |
0-9 |
0-11 |
0-17 |
2-17 |
5-23 |
7-23 |
History: Add. 1998, Act 317, Eff. Dec. 15, 1998
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: People v. Harper, 739 N.W.2d 523 (Mich. 2007).
People v. Harper, 739 N.W.2d 523 (Mich. 2007). “MCL 777.68 sets forth the class G sentencing grid.”
People v. McCuller, 715 N.W.2d 798 (Mich. 2006). “MCL 777.68 and MCL 777.69. All class F felonies fall in an intermediate sanction cell if the defendant has fewer than 50 PRV points.”
People v. Stauffer, 640 N.W.2d 869 (Mich. 2002). “16y, and the range for the minimum sentence is found in MCL 777.68. 6 MCL 769.34(3) provides that “[a] court may depart from the appropriate sentence range established under the sentencing guidelines set forth in [MCL 777.”
People of Michigan v. Allen Clifford McKenzie (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “Defendant’s minimum sentence range was 0 to 17 months, MCL 777.68, placing him in an intermediate sanction cell, MCL 769.”
People of Michigan v. Jesse Gene Burns (Mich. 2007). “The Court of Appeals denied defendant’s delayed application for leave to appeal, citing lack of merit in the grounds presented. Harper then applied for leave to appeal in this Court.”
People of Michigan v. Stacy Lynn Radtke (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 777.68. Thus, under the legislative guidelines, defendant’s recommended minimum sentence range was 0 to 17 months.”
People of Michigan v. Steve Wynale Griffin (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “” Defendant’s total PRV score was 45 points, placing him at PRV level D on the sentencing grid for Class G offenses, MCL 777.68, under which the sentencing offense fell, MCL 777.”
People of Michigan v. Steve Wynale Griffin (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “” Defendant’s total PRV score was 45 points, placing him at PRV level D on the sentencing grid for Class G offenses, MCL 777.68, under which the sentencing offense fell, MCL 777.”
People of Michigan v. Damontae Demetrious Calvin (Mich. Ct. App. 2019). “Defendant received a total OV score of 20 points, which combined with his 65 prior record variable points, placed him in the E-III cell of the applicable sentencing grid, for which the minimum sentence range is 5 to 46 months for a fourth-offense habitual offender.”
Bush 236637 v. Horton (W.D. Mich. 2020). “Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.68 . In the Class G Grid, that change would move Petitioner’s guidelines minimum sentence range from 2 to 21 months to 0 to 21 months.”
People of Michigan v. James Drake (Mich. Ct. App. 2024). “” With these changes, defendant’s total PRV score was 30 points and his total OV score was 50 points, and his recommended minimum sentencing guidelines ranges were 29 to 57 months for possession of methamphetamine, MCL 777.”
20250124_C365531_49_365531.Opn.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “See MCL 777.68. Even if the trial court clearly erred when it found that defendant committed two contemporaneous felonious criminal acts involving other crimes, that error would only reduce her OV total to 20 points, which would not change the applicable sentencing grid.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 777.68(1)(a) — 1 case
People of Michigan v. Richard Lee Coleman Jr (Mich. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.