Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.903 (2026)

Crime victim services commission; duties.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CRIME VICTIMS RIGHTS SERVICES

Act 196 of 1989

780.903 Crime victim services commission; duties.

Sec. 3.

The commission shall do all of the following:

(a) Investigate and determine the amount of revenue needed to pay for crime victim's rights services.

(b) Investigate and determine an appropriate assessment amount to be imposed against convicted criminal defendants and juveniles for whom the probate court or the family division of circuit court enters orders of disposition for juvenile offenses to pay for crime victim's rights services.

(c) By December 31 of each year, report to the governor, the secretary of the senate, the clerk of the house of representatives, and the department the commission's findings and recommendations under this section.

History: 1989, Act 196, Eff. Oct. 30, 1989 ;-- Am. 1993, Act 345, Eff. May 1, 1994 ;-- Am. 1996, Act 520, Imd. Eff. Jan. 13, 1997

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2014 · leading case: People v. Earl, 845 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

People v. Earl, 845 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014). · cites it 2× “[MCL 780.903.] The Legislature established the Crime Victim’s Rights Fund to pay for crime victim’s rights services.”

People v. Matthews, 508 N.W.2d 173 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “The criminal assessment commission act provides that the assessment amount be investigated and determined by the commission on the basis of the amount of revenue needed to pay for crime victim rights services, MCL 780.903; MSA 28.1287(903). Moreover, contrary to defendant’s…”

— Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.903(b) — 1 case

People v. Earl, 845 N.W.2d 721 (Mich. 2014). “[MCL 780.903.] The Legislature established the Crime Victim’s Rights Fund to pay for crime victim’s rights services.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.