Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 791 / Act 232 of 1953
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.265g (2026)

Definitions.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

CORRECTIONS CODE OF 1953


Act 232 of 1953


791.265g Definitions.

Sec. 65g.

    As used in this section and sections 65h and 65i:

    (a) "Community corrections center" means that term as defined in section 65a.

    (b) "Community residential home" means that term as defined in section 65a.

    (c) "Community status criteria" means the criteria for determining which prisoners are eligible to be placed in community corrections facilities as prescribed in section 65(g)(1).

    (d) "Council" means a citizens' council formed under section 65i(1).

    (e) "Prisoner" means a person who is under the jurisdiction of the department and has not been released on parole or discharged.

    (f) "State correctional facility" means that term as defined in section 65a.

History: Add. 1990, Act 353, Imd. Eff. Dec. 26, 1990

Compiler's Notes:

    In subdivision (c), the reference to “section 65(g)(1)” evidently should be “section 65h(1).”

PopularName Notes:

Department of Corrections Act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Lickfeldt v. Dep't of Corr., 636 N.W.2d 272 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lickfeldt v. Dep't of Corr., 636 N.W.2d 272 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “§ 791.265g(e). [1] A trial court's determination regarding a writ of mandamus is reviewed by this Court for an abuse of discretion.”
People v. Woods, 535 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 791.265g(e); MSA 28.2325(7)(e). - Defendant had not yet been released on parole, but was serving his time in his own residence and was monitored on an electronic tether.”
20250116_C363151_52_363151.Opn_Order.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “” He contends it was the product of an “inchoate hunch” following his arrest for driving on a suspended license.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 791.265g(e) — 3 cases
Lickfeldt v. Dep't of Corr., 636 N.W.2d 272 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001). “§ 791.265g(e). [1] A trial court's determination regarding a writ of mandamus is reviewed by this Court for an abuse of discretion.”
People v. Woods, 535 N.W.2d 259 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “MCL 791.265g(e); MSA 28.2325(7)(e). - Defendant had not yet been released on parole, but was serving his time in his own residence and was monitored on an electronic tether.”
20250116_C363151_52_363151.Opn_Order.Pdf (Mich. Ct. App. 2025). “” He contends it was the product of an “inchoate hunch” following his arrest for driving on a suspended license.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.