Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.4 (2026)
Effect of repeal of repealing statute.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Revised Statutes of 1846
R.S. of 1846
8.4 Effect of repeal of repealing statute.
Sec. 4.
Whenever a statute, or any part thereof shall be repealed by a subsequent statute, such statute, or any part thereof, so repealed, shall not be revived by the repeal of such subsequent repealing statute.
History: R.S. 1846, Ch. 1 ;-- CL 1857, 3 ;-- CL 1871, 3 ;-- How. 3 ;-- CL 1897, 51 ;-- CL 1915, 65 ;-- CL 1929, 77 ;-- CL 1948, 8.4
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1950–2024 · leading case: In Re Dow Corning Corp., 255 B.R. 445 (E.D. Mich. 2000).
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 255 B.R. 445 (E.D. Mich. 2000). “Joint Plan, § 8.4. In response to the Amended Joint Plan, several claimants vehemently argued that the injunction provision violated the Bankruptcy Code.”
In Re MCI Telecomm. Complaint, 596 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 1999). “§ 8.4; MSA 2.213; Jackson v. Corrections Comm.”
In re City of Detroit, 504 B.R. 97 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2013). “16, 2012): 6 Petitioner’s reliance on the anti-revival statute, MCL 8.4, is unavailing. The plain language of MCL 8.”
In re City of Detroit, 504 B.R. 191 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2013). “16, 2012): 6 Petitioner’s reliance on the anti-revival statute, MCL 8.4, is unavailing. The plain language of MCL 8.”
People v. Goforth, 564 N.W.2d 526 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “" LaFave, 3 Search and Seizure (3d ed), § 8.4(b), p. 768. In the present case, defendant, though not a minor, resided with his mother, who had "ready access" to clean his room and to gather laundry.”
In Re Dow Corning Corp., 244 B.R. 721 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1999). “§ 8.4. Clearly, the Code does not mandate that provisions of this sort be included in a plan.”
Sayers v. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 114 N.W.2d 191 (Mich. 1962). “213) provides: "Whenever a statute, or any part thereof, shall be repealed by a subsequent statute, such statute, or any part thereof, so repealed, shall not be revived by the repeal of such subsequent repealing statute." But no change was made in the rule as it applied to…”
Phillips v. Ingham Cnty., 371 F. Supp. 2d 918 (W.D. Mich. 2005). “Indeed, both the state and federal systems for regulation of shelters and animal dealers depend on the honest reporting of citizens as to facts about animal ownership.”
Brunet v. Murphy, 135 P.3d 714 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 77-201 (2004); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 8.4 (a) (2006); Minn.”
Detroit Terrazzo Contractors Ass'n v. Bd. of Trs. of the B.A.C. Local 32 Ins. Fund, 176 F. Supp. 2d 733 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “Section 8.4. provides: Resignation. A Trustee may resign and become and remain fully discharged from all further duty or responsibility hereunder upon giving 30 days’ notice, in writing, to the remaining Trustees, or such shorter notice as the remaining Trustees may accept as…”
Detroit Edison Co. v. Janosz, 87 N.W.2d 126 (Mich. 1957). “4 (Stat Ann §8.4), condemnation by the State; CL 1948, § 123.”
United States v. Certain Land Situated in Detroit, 178 F. Supp. 2d 792 (E.D. Mich. 2001). “Attorney General [see MOA § 8.4, p. 29] and that approval was not obtained until April 30, 1992.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 8.4(b) — 2 cases
People v. Goforth, 564 N.W.2d 526 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “" LaFave, 3 Search and Seizure (3d ed), § 8.4(b), p. 768. In the present case, defendant, though not a minor, resided with his mother, who had "ready access" to clean his room and to gather laundry.”
Phillips v. Ingham Cnty., 371 F. Supp. 2d 918 (W.D. Mich. 2005). “Indeed, both the state and federal systems for regulation of shelters and animal dealers depend on the honest reporting of citizens as to facts about animal ownership.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.