Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 800.401 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
THE STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT ACT
Act 253 of 1935
800.401 Short title.
Sec. 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as "the state correctional facility reimbursement act."
History: 1935, Act 253, Imd. Eff. June 8, 1935 ;-- CL 1948, 800.401 ;-- Am. 1984, Act 282, Imd. Eff. Dec. 20, 1984
Constitutionality Notes:
The Prison Reimbursement Act was intended to apply to all inmates of the state penal system and was not limited to the inmates of the three penal institutions named in the act and in existence at the time of its passage; nor is the act violative of the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. State Treasurer v Wilson, 423 Mich 138; 347 NW2d 770 (1985).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 46
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1972–2024 · leading case: State Treasurer v. Schuster, 572 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 1998).
State Treasurer v. Schuster, 572 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 1998). “§ 800.401 et seq.; M.S.A. § 28.1701 et seq.”
State Treasurer v. Abbott, 660 N.W.2d 714 (Mich. 2003). “§ 800.401 et seq. The Court of Appeals reversed because subsection 1056(d)(1) of ERISA prohibits an assignment or alienation of pension benefits.”
State Treasurer v. Wilson, 377 N.W.2d 703 (Mich. 1985). “That Plaintiff has a good reason to believe and does believe that Defendant, Hardy Wilson, has an estate which should be subject to the payment to the State of the expenses paid by the State on behalf of the Defendant as a resident at a State penal institution in accordance with…”
State Treasurer v. Sprague, 772 N.W.2d 452 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “Under the State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (SCFRA), MCL 800.401 et seq., the state is entitled to attach prisoners' assets to reimburse the state for the cost of imprisonment.”
Roberts v. Baugh, 986 F. Supp. 1074 (E.D. Mich. 1997). “State Treasurer Roberts (hereinafter “plaintiff’) filed an action pursuant to the State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (hereinafter “SCFRA”), Mich.Comp.Laws Ann. § 800.401 et seq; Mich.”
Michigan Dep't of Treasury v. Michalec, 181 F. Supp. 2d 731 (E.D. Mich. 2002). “§ 800.401, et seq. In its complaint, the plaintiff alleges defendant Michalec receives pension benefits of approximately $1,800 per month from General Motors Corporation.”
State Treasurer v. Schuster, 547 N.W.2d 332 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “Plaintiff brought this action under the State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act (scfra), MCL 800.401 et seq.; MSA 28.1701 et seq., seeking reimbursement for the cost of defendant Jon Schuster’s care while he is incarcerated in a state correctional facility.”
In Re Juv. Commitment Costs, 613 N.W.2d 348 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “See the State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act, MCL 800.401 et seq.-, MSA 28.1701 et seq.”
State Treasurer v. Gardner, 564 N.W.2d 51 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997). “§ 800.401 et seq.; M.S.A. § 28.1701 et seq.”
State Treasurer v. Snyder, 823 N.W.2d 284 (Mich. Ct. App. 2011). “Defendant, Wayne Snyder, appeals by delayed leave granted an order holding that his put-ported disclaimer of life insurance proceeds was void and directing that 90 percent of those proceeds be paid to plaintiff, the State Treasurer, in partial reimbursement for the cost of…”
State Treasurer v. Wilson, 388 N.W.2d 312 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “The statute involved is the Prison Reimbursement Act (now the State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act), MCL 800.401 et seq.; MSA 28.1701 et seq. Our previous opinion is reported at 132 Mich App 648 ; 347 NW2d 770 (1984).”
People v. Houston, 604 N.W.2d 706 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “, MCL 800.401 et seq.; MSA 28.1701 et seq. (State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act [SCFRA]), MCL 801.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 800.401(a) — 1 case
State Treasurer v. Schuster, 572 N.W.2d 628 (Mich. 1998). “§ 800.401 et seq.; M.S.A. § 28.1701 et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.