Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 801.81 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE PRISONER REIMBURSEMENT TO THE COUNTY ACT


Act 118 of 1984


801.81 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as “the prisoner reimbursement to the county act.”

History: 1984, Act 118, Imd. Eff. June 1, 1984

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1988–2012 · leading case: Mudge v. MacOmb Cnty., 580 N.W.2d 845 (Mich. 1998).
Mudge v. MacOmb Cnty., 580 N.W.2d 845 (Mich. 1998). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleged two causes of action: (1) breach of state law under the Prisoner Reimbursement to the County Act (PRCA), MCL 801.81 et seq.) MSA 28.1770(1) et seq.”
In Re Juv. Commitment Costs, 613 N.W.2d 348 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “, and the Prisoner Reimbursement to the County Act, MCL 801.81 et seq.-, MSA 28.1770(1) et seq.”
People v. Houston, 604 N.W.2d 706 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “(State Correctional Facility Reimbursement Act [SCFRA]), MCL 801.81 et seq.; MSA 28.1770(1) et seq.”
Mudge v. MacOmb Cnty., 534 N.W.2d 539 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “Mudge and Jonathon Brown, alleged that defendants, Macomb County, Macomb County Sheriff’s Department, and William Hackel, the Macomb County Sheriff, violated the Prisoner Reimbursement to the County Act (prca), MCL 801.81 et seq.; MSA 28.1770(1) et seq.”
People v. Gonyo, 434 N.W.2d 223 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “However, we note that the Legislature has specifically provided under the Prisoner Reimbursement to the County Act, MCL 801.81 et seq.; MSA 28.1770(1) et seq.”
Neal v. Dep't of Corr., 824 N.W.2d 285 (Mich. Ct. App. 2012). “406, the prisoner reimbursement to the county act, 1984 PA 118 , MCL 801.81 to 801.93, 1982 PA 14 , MCL 801.”
Tracy Neal v. Dep't of Corr. (Mich. 2011). “406, the prisoner reimbursement to the county act, 1984 PA 118 , MCL 801.81 to 801.93, 1982 PA 14 , MCL 801.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.