Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 1. SOVEREIGNTY, JURISDICTION, EMERGENCY OPERATION, GENERAL POLICIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 1.01 (2026)

Extent

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The sovereignty and jurisdiction of this state extend to all places within its boundaries as defined in the constitution and, concurrently, to the waters forming a common boundary between this and adjoining states, subject only to rights of jurisdiction acquired by the United States over places in it.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1956–2026 · leading case: Tynan v. Kstp, Inc., 77 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 1956).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tynan v. Kstp, Inc., 77 N.W.2d 200 (Minn. 1956). · cites it 4× “The collective bargaining agreement in the case at bar provides for its duration under section 1.01 of Article I — for termination or changes under section 1.”
Christian v. Birch, 763 N.W.2d 50 (Minn. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “§ 1.01 (2007) ("The sovereignty and jurisdiction of this state extend to all places within the boundaries declared in article II of the constitution.”
Heimerl v. Tech Elec. of Minnesota, Inc., 9 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Minnesota 2014). · cites it 4× “2, § 1.01.) However, it contained an “evergreen provision,” so that unless changed or terminated, the Inside Agreement would continue in effect from May 1 until April 30 of each year.”
Peterson v. Peterson, 242 N.W.2d 88 (Minn. 1976). “In recognition that all situations are not covered by the special rules, and in keeping with the district court’s authority to adopt rules not in conflict with statutes or the Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 17, § 1.01, of the special rules provides that the Rules of Civil…”
Meyer v. Nwokedi, 777 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 2010). “Steenson, Minnesota No-Fault Automobile Insurance § 1.01 (3d ed.2007). The parties do not dispute that the phrase “financial responsibility” in the Graves Amendment refers to insurance-like requirements under state law.”
Dryer v. Nat'l Football League, 689 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (D. Minnesota 2010). · cites it 2× “” 1 Nimmer on Copyright § 1.01[B][l][c], at 1-30. Thus, the work at issue is not within the subject matter of copyright.”
Amcon Corp. v. City of Eagan, 348 N.W.2d 66 (Minn. 1984). “” 1 Rathkopf, The Law of Zoning and Planning § 1.01, 1-9 (4th ed. 1975). Residential use was considered the highest (i.”
Marriage of Warwick v. Warwick, 438 N.W.2d 673 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). “Noting that Second Judicial District Special Rule 17 § 1.01 states: The Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of Minnesota shall apply to practice in the Family Court Division except where in conflict with applicable statutes, the Peterson court resolved the…”
Piotrowski v. Comm'r of Pub. Saf., 433 N.W.2d 124 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 1.01 (1986). Both Minnesota and North Dakota have laws governing jurisdiction of foreign officers when in fresh pursuit of a suspected felon.”
M. L. Gordon Sash & Door Co. v. Mormann, 271 N.W.2d 436 (Minn. 1978). “Vendor and Purchaser, § 1.01 (3d ed. rev. 1977); 77Am.Jur.2d Vendor and Purchaser, § 27.”
Thomas Styczinski v. Grace Arnold, 141 F.4th 950 (8th Cir. 2025). “2021) (citing Minn. Stat. § 1.01 ). Under this presumption, even if a statute does not “expressly exclude out-of-state” conduct, the Minnesota Supreme Court would not read it to include extraterritorial actions absent indication to the contrary.”
Briggs Transp. Co. v. Second Nw. Nat'l Bank of Minneapolis, 406 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 4× “” Section 1.01(r) of the 1975 agreement defined “Prime Rate” as the lowest interest rate regularly charged from time to time by Central on 90-day so-called ‘large business’ loans to corporate commercial customers of the highest credit rating; any change in such rate shall, for…”
Show all 18 citing cases →
— Minn. Stat. § 1.01(h) — 1 case
UMB Bank, N.A. v. Ad Lucem Inc. (D. Minnesota 2020).
— Minn. Stat. § 1.01(r) — 1 case
Briggs Transp. Co. v. Second Nw. Nat'l Bank of Minneapolis, 406 N.W.2d 7 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “” Section 1.01(r) of the 1975 agreement defined “Prime Rate” as the lowest interest rate regularly charged from time to time by Central on 90-day so-called ‘large business’ loans to corporate commercial customers of the highest credit rating; any change in such rate shall, for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.