Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 106.151 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1985 c 172 s 133]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1954–1992 · leading case: Cnty. of Swift v. Boyle, 481 N.W.2d 74 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cnty. of Swift v. Boyle, 481 N.W.2d 74 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 8× “5 Swift County argues that its viewers were statutorily required to assess the lands in Pope and Stevens County under Minn.Stat. § 106.151 (1984). This statute requires viewers to “find and report the benefits accruing to all lands and properties affected and benefitted,” and…”

Petition of Ittel, 386 N.W.2d 387 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “We recognize that under Minn.Stat. § 106.151 viewers have broad discretion in determining benefits and to some extent the trial court’s instructions may infringe on this discretion.”

Swoboda v. Cnty. of Renville, 62 N.W.2d 816 (Minn. 1954). “For example, § 106.151, which refers to the duties of viewers and their reports, requires that their reports show the names of the owners as they appear on the current tax duplicate of the county.”

In Re Improvement of Cnty. Ditch No. 1, Yellow Med. Cnty., 62 N.W.2d 80 (Minn. 1954). · cites it 3× “3 Under § 106.151, which is the sole statutory guide for determining benefits in drainage improvement proceedings, lands may be assessed for benefits when the construction of the drainage system “makes an outlet more accessible, or otherwise directly benefits such lands or…”

Aastad v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 110 N.W.2d 19 (Minn. 1961). “the proposed ditch, but it also makes the further provision: “If the proposed drainage system furnishes outlet to any existing county or judicial ditch and it appears that such outlet will benefit the existing ditch and the lands drained thereby, .”

Westphal v. Schmalz, 169 N.W.2d 401 (Minn. 1969). · cites it 4× “” Section 106.151, upon which defendant relies, grants an implicit right to a landowner who has been assessed for the benefits of a judicial ditch system to make use of the system for continuing drainage of land for which he was assessed.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.