Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 106. DRAINAGE
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 106.89 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1947 c 143 s 67]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1953–1957 · leading case: Schultz v. Cnty. of Chippewa, 57 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1953).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schultz v. Cnty. of Chippewa, 57 N.W.2d 158 (Minn. 1953). · cites it 2× “In determining whether a ditch is practicable or not, one of the essential factors is an adequate *402 outlet. The trial court found specifically that the proposed ditch would not have a sufficient outlet.”
In Re Petition of Lippmann, 81 N.W.2d 100 (Minn. 1957). “92, reads: “Section 63 combines the provisions of Sections 106.89, 106.90, 107.17, and 108.”
State Ex Rel. Mosloski v. Cnty. of Martin, 80 N.W.2d 637 (Minn. 1957). “92, provides: "Section 63 combines the provisions of Sections 106.89, 106.90,107.17, and 108.25.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.