Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 108.04 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1947 c 143 s 67]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1950–1963 · leading case: Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 42 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. 1950).
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 42 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. 1950). “1939, § 108.04(5) (a), provides: “An employe who has left (or * * * lost) his employment with an employer because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute shall not be eligible for benefits from such * * * employer’s account for any week in which such strike or other bona…”
Johnson v. Wilson & Co., 124 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 1963). “1961, § 108.04(10), provides: “An employe who has left (or partially or totally lost) his employment with an employing unit because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute shall not be eligible for benefits * * * for any week in which such strike or other bona fide labor…”
— Minn. Stat. § 108.04(10) — 1 case
Johnson v. Wilson & Co., 124 N.W.2d 496 (Minn. 1963). “1961, § 108.04(10), provides: “An employe who has left (or partially or totally lost) his employment with an employing unit because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute shall not be eligible for benefits * * * for any week in which such strike or other bona fide labor…”
— Minn. Stat. § 108.04(5) — 1 case
Nordling v. Ford Motor Co., 42 N.W.2d 576 (Minn. 1950). “1939, § 108.04(5) (a), provides: “An employe who has left (or * * * lost) his employment with an employer because of a strike or other bona fide labor dispute shall not be eligible for benefits from such * * * employer’s account for any week in which such strike or other bona…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.