Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 112.35 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1990 c 391 art 10 s 4]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1984–1989 · leading case: Dahle v. Red Lake Watershed Dist., 354 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Dahle v. Red Lake Watershed Dist., 354 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 112.35, subd. 3 (1982). This definition does not exclude the watershed district.”

In re the Appeal of Holasek, 436 N.W.2d 483 (Minn. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 112.35, subd. 4 (1988). Managers is defined to mean the Board of Managers of a watershed district.”

Love v. Burlington N., Inc., 407 N.W.2d 452 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). “48 of the Watershed Act requires that a “project” be instituted only by filing a petition, and the installation of the culvert was a “project” as defined by § 112.35, subd. 19. Approving a petition for a project requires much more formal proceedings than does the issuance of a…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.