Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 115B.13 (2026)

Double Recovery Prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A person who recovers response costs or damages pursuant to sections 115B.01 to 115B.15 may not recover the same costs or damages pursuant to any other law. A person who recovers response costs or damages pursuant to any other state or federal law may not recover for the same costs or damages pursuant to sections 115B.01 to 115B.15.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Moorhead Econ. Dev. Auth. v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860 (Minn. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Moorhead Econ. Dev. Auth. v. Anda, 789 N.W.2d 860 (Minn. 2010). · cites it 10× “Citing Minn.Stat. § 115B.13 (2008), the concurrence/dissent states that Minnesota law explicitly prohibits double recovery and that therefore, double liability is not a concern.”

Gopher Oil Co., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 757 F. Supp. 998 (D. Minnesota 1991). · cites it 2× “§ 9614 (b); Minn.Stat. § 115B.13. The court need not decide under which one statute Gopher Oil is entitled to recover, however.”

Control Data Corp. v. S.C.S.C. Corp., 53 F.3d 930 (8th Cir. 1995). “That does not mean that a plaintiff may not “prevail” under both statutes. That is what happened in this case.”

Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants (Minn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 115B.13. This appeal follows.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.