Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 117.13 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1969 [Repealed, 1971 c 595 s 29]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1943–1999 · leading case: N. States Power Co. v. Esperson, 144 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. 1966).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

N. States Power Co. v. Esperson, 144 N.W.2d 372 (Minn. 1966). · cites it 2× “14 provides in part as follows: “* * * Except as herein otherwise provided, the trial shall be conducted and the cause disposed of according to the rules applicable to ordinary civil actions in the district court.”

Hous. & Redevelopment Auth. ex rel. City of Richfield v. Adelmann, 590 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 117.13 (1969). In 1971, however, the legislature revised this provision to add a mailing requirement: At any time within 40 days from the date that the report has been filed, any party to the proceedings may appeal to the district court from any award of damages…”

Hollenbeck v. State, 8 N.W.2d 613 (Minn. 1943). “§ 117.13 (§ 6549), the existing statute, and since no *491 notice of the filing of the commissioners’ award had been served upon them, therefore their respective appeals were timely and that the trial court erred in dismissing them.”

Hous. & Redevel. Auth. v. Adelmann, 590 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1999). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 117.13 (1969). In 1971, however, the legislature revised this provision to add a mailing requirement: At any time within 40 days from the date that the report has been filed, any party to the proceedings may appeal to the district court from any award of damages…”

N. States Power Co. v. Schulze, 204 N.W.2d 212 (Minn. 1973). “1969, § 117.13, the statute governing appeals, provides in part as follows: “At any time within 30 days after service of the notice that the report has been filed, the owner of lands taken may appeal to the district court from any award of damages embraced in the report, or from…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.