Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 117.16 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1969 [Repealed, 1971 c 595 s 29]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1950–2024 · leading case: State, by Head v. Savage, 255 N.W.2d 32 (Minn. 1977).
State, by Head v. Savage, 255 N.W.2d 32 (Minn. 1977). “§ 117.16, to recover reasonable costs and expenses incurred “by reason of the condemnation, the delay in prosecution of that proceeding, and its eventual dismissal by the State of Minnesota, and for judgment against the State of Minnesota for such sum as may be determined,…”
State v. Miller Home Dev., Inc., 50 A.L.R. 2d 1377 (Minn. 1954). “land, the amount of land to be taken by the state is reduced by a stipulation which also provides for the abandonment of the tailing of a right of access from the land not to be taken, does such abandonment of the right of access relate to a severable controversy with respect to…”
Anderson v. Medtronic, Inc., 382 N.W.2d 512 (Minn. 1986). “1977) (similarly construing Minn.Stat. § 117.16 but including attorney fees where statute permits "reasonable costs and expenses including fees of counsel").”
City of Minnetonka v. Carlson, 265 N.W.2d 205 (Minn. 1978). “We went on to state that the contingent fee arrangement was only one of the factors which should be considered in determining reasonable value: “ * * * [W]hat constitutes the reasonable value of the legal services is a question of fact to be determined by the evidence submitted,…”
State Ex Rel. Mondale v. Nelson, 125 N.W.2d 166 (Minn. 1963). “Thereafter appellant petitioned the court for costs and expenses, including attorneys’ fees, pursuant to § 117.16, which provides in part as follows: “* * * When the proceeding is so dismissed or the same is discontinued by the petitioner the owner may recover from the…”
State v. Bentley, 45 N.W.2d 185 (Minn. 1950). “Section 117.16 provides that all damages allowed under the eminent domain chapter, whether by the commissioners or upon appeal, “shall bear interest from the time of the filing of the commissioners’ report.”
City of Thief River Falls v. Swick, 207 N.W.2d 356 (Minn. 1973). “1969, § 117.16, permitted the allowance of attorneys’ fees incurred in inverse condemnation proceedings which were dismissed when the original condemnation was discontinued.”
Pettingill Theatre Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 98 N.W.2d 207 (Minn. 1959). “It is the contention of relator that, notwithstanding the charter provisions referred to, it is entitled to interest on the award; reimbursement for real estate taxes paid following the petition for condemnation; and costs incurred in connection with the appeal, all pursuant to…”
Gershone v. City of Minneapolis, 60 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 1953). “16 or to have us, by analogy, construe the above Minneapolis charter provision as providing for the same result in an abandonment of a condemnation proceeding as provided under § 117.16. Section 117.16 reads as follows: “All damages allowed under this chapter, whether by the…”
In Re Widening East Franklin Avenue, 240 Minn. 32 (Minn. 1953). “16 or to have us, by analogy, construe the above Minneapolis charter provision as providing for the same result in an abandonment of a condemnation proceeding as provided under § 117.16. Section 117.16 reads as follows: "All damages allowed under this chapter, whether by the…”
State of Minnesota, by its Comm'r of Transp. v. David J. Schaffer, Below, ..., 8 N.W.3d 220 (Minn. 2024). “2d at 426 (holding that fee agreements are not the controlling factor in calculating attorney fees under Minn. Stat. § 117.16 ); City of Minnetonka v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.