Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 120.10 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 71 art 8 s 26]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1970–1986 · leading case: State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1985).
State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn. 1985). “3, the compulsory attendance law, because her home school did not comply with Minn.Stat. § 120.10, subd. 2 (1984) in that she lacked the formal education training required of teachers under that statute.”
In Re the Welfare of L.Z., 396 N.W.2d 214 (Minn. 1986). “See Minn.Stat. § 120.10, subd. 3 (1984). The state argues, however, it is extremely difficult to prove why a child is absent from school, i.”
Americans United Inc. v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 622, 179 N.W.2d 146 (Minn. 1970). ““School children attending any schools, complying with Minnesota Statutes, Section 120.10, Subdivision 2, are therefore, entitled to the same rights and privileges relating to transportation.”
Minnesota Ass'n of Pub. Schs. v. Hanson, 178 N.W.2d 846 (Minn. 1970). “46 shall not apply to any school district or unorganized territory in which is located any existing private school maintaining elementary and secondary education for 75 percent of the eligible pupils within the district or territory and complying with the requirements of…”
Matter of Welfare of LZ, 380 N.W.2d 898 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “was cited with one count of habitual truancy under Minn.Stat. § 120.10 (1984). A referee originally heard L.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.