Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 122.18 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1950–2012 · leading case: Emerson v. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. 199, 809 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Emerson v. Bd. of Indep. Sch. Dist. 199, 809 N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 2× “See Minn. Stat. § 122.18 , subd. 1 (providing that the Board of Teaching must license "teachers" as defined in section 1224.”

Peterson v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 116, 58 N.W.2d 465 (Minn. 1953). · cites it 2× “We have expressly held that neither the county nor the county superintendent of schools is a proper or necessary party in an appeal under §§ 122.18 to 122.27. 2 We have also held that, for reasons of public policy and to preserve the rights of the parties to such proceedings in…”

In Re Order of Superintendent of Schs., Nobles Cnty., 239 Minn. 233 (Minn. 1953). · cites it 2× “We have expressly held that neither the county nor the county superintendent of schools is a proper or necessary party in an appeal under §§ 122.18 to 122.27. [2] We have also held that, for reasons of public policy and to preserve the rights of the parties to such proceedings…”

Huffman v. Sch. Bd. of Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 41 N.W.2d 455 (Minn. 1950). · cites it 2× “26, so far as here pertinent, provided; “Nothing in sections 122.18 to 122.27 6 shall be construed to transfer the liability of existing bonded indebtedness from the district or territory against which it was originally incurred.”

State Ex Rel. Helling v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 160, 92 N.W.2d 70 (Minn. 1958). “The first statutory procedural step in the consolidation proceeding under §§ 122.18 to 122.22 is the filing of a plat with the state commissioner of education for approval.”

Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 66 v. Big Stone Cnty., 67 N.W.2d 903 (Minn. 1954). “reasons for asking such change, the board, upon notice and hearing as in the case of the formation of a new district and upon proof of all the allegations of the petition, may make its order granting the same, provided, that when the petition requests that territory be detached…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.