Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 122.28 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1947–1967 · leading case: In Re Dissolution of Sch. Dist. No. 33, 60 N.W.2d 60 (Minn. 1953).
In Re Dissolution of Sch. Dist. No. 33, 60 N.W.2d 60 (Minn. 1953). “28? (2) To what extent are proceedings under § 122.28 controlled by other statutory provisions relating to a change of boundaries as provided for under § 122.”
Sullivan v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 102, 88 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 1958). “We therefore hold that, when the county superintendent has acted upon the petition, it is too late to withdraw.”
Muehring v. Sch. Dist. No. 31, 28 N.W.2d 655 (Minn. 1947). “§ 122.28. Changing an independent district to a common school district.”
In Re Dissolution of Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 27, 60 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1953). “” We have recently had occasion to pass upon the authority of a county board to dissolve a functioning school district and to *261 attach it to another district under § 122.”
State Ex Rel. Vill. of Orono v. Vill. of Long Lake, 77 N.W.2d 46 (Minn. 1956). “28 [the statute involved in that case] does not prescribe what must be contained in a petition, nevertheless, by necessary implication the school district sought to be dissolved must as a jurisdictional prerequisite be described with sufficient accuracy and completeness that…”
Appeal of Meyer v. Vill. of Waite Park, 152 N.W.2d 778 (Minn. 1967). “We therefore hold that, when the county superintendent has acted upon the petition, it is too late to withdraw.” It is made clear by our decisions cited herein that, while, up to a point, an initiating petitioner might withdraw, when the attempt occurs, as it has in the instant…”
Brossard v. Durst, 102 N.W.2d 30 (Minn. 1960). “1953, § 122.28, 1 by petition *411 signed by all resident freeholders of the district, some 32 in number.”
Brossard v. Durst, 120 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. 1963). “1953, § 122.28, resulted in an order made in 1956 by the Dodge County Board of County Commissioners dissolving the district and directing attachment of its lands to School District No.”
In Re Dissolution & Distrib. of Sch. Dist. No. 5, 257 Minn. 409 (Minn. 1960). “The petition provided space where its signers might designate the adjacent school district to which each desired the lands of School District No. 5 to be attached in the event of dissolution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.