Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 124.02 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1953 [Repealed, 1957 c 947 art 9 s 9]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1955–1965 · leading case: Green v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 89 N.W.2d 12 (Minn. 1958).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Green v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 89 N.W.2d 12 (Minn. 1958). · cites it 4× “2, as submitting only one proposition or question on the ballot. Were the voters, however, fraudulently misled by ballot question No.”

Buhl v. Jt. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 11, 82 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1957). · cites it 2× “Practically all the foreign cases considering similar questions recognize the basic rule that a separate proposition must be placed on the ballot for each distinct and independent object or purpose for which indebtedness is contemplated.”

Lindahl v. Indep. Sch. Dist. No. 306, 133 N.W.2d 23 (Minn. 1965). “according to its judgment and discre *171 tion, submit as a single ballot question or as two or more separate questions in the notice of election and ballots the proposition of their issuance for any one or more of the following, stated conjunctively or in the alternative:…”

Green v. Indep. Consol. Sch. Dist. No. 1, 68 N.W.2d 493 (Minn. 1955). · cites it 5× “The provisions of § 124.02, subd. 2, 6 prescribing election rules for annual and special 7 elections in independent school districts, clearly condemn the combination of alternative electoral authorization proposals in such a manner as to vitiate the discriminatory nature of an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.